Exactly. In defense of Sir55, I can see a scenario in which the 9-yard could be a misinterpretation of the rules. If this happens as described, the HC calls a TO to discuss a misapplication of the rule, and as WH I question my wing to the effect of "Hey, did the guy fulfill the requirement?" and he says something like, "No, but I didn't think he had to because of the new :40." Then I have a problem. He has misinterpreted and misapplied the rule. But, even then we must be cautious. If he replies, "No, but both A and B were in formation. They had him covered so i judged no advantage," then my reply to the coach would be, "Coach, my guy determined no advantage gained. TD stands." Then I'll take the butt-chewing that will inevitably ensue..