Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10
41
NCAA Discussion / Re: Scrimmage kicks
« Last post by TXMike on March 03, 2025, 03:31:14 PM »
I'll exaggerate your example to emphasize the point of your question. 4/10 at the A-30. A10 drop kicks the ball from behind the LOS and the kicked ball subsequently rolls OOB at the B-30, untouched by B.
Where do you place the ball for the next snap?

The A-30 

This thread popped up when I was pondering another issue.

Why are carry over penaltes permitted for some Team A fouls on punts but not on FG attempts.  What is the logic behind that?
42
Non-Officiating Discussion / Re: Blog....high school coaching.. "Did you win?"
« Last post by Ralph Damren on March 03, 2025, 06:27:20 AM »
Great story, Rglodich, in high school sports 'winning" carries many definitions.
                                                                            aWaRd
43
NCAA Discussion / Re: 2025 NCAA Proposed Rule Changes
« Last post by ElvisLives on March 02, 2025, 11:52:31 AM »
The off-returner will stick his arms straight out to signal the other returner to take a touchback.
I'm not sure why they needed a rule change, they could have interpreted it as an invalid signal like they did with the get away signal.

The T signal is static, and the get away signal is dynamic (involving some level of ‘waving’). They restricted waving signals, so an interpretation of the get away as being an invalid signal fits the model. A static signal didn’t, so a rule change will correct that. But I wonder if it will extend to the forward static pointing, as well?
Somebody ask, as soon as you can.
44
Non-Officiating Discussion / Blog....high school coaching.. "Did you win?"
« Last post by Rglodich on March 02, 2025, 10:13:04 AM »
Latest blog from a Michigan high school football coach.. hope you enjoy!!

https://www.ronglodich.com/author-blog/vnfb7kgg6phq41ej613oozg4du1725
45
NCAA Discussion / Re: 2025 NCAA Proposed Rule Changes
« Last post by bama_stripes on March 02, 2025, 06:39:53 AM »
OK, thanks.

I predicted several years ago that, within one generation, there would be no more kicking in football other than FGs and XPs.  It may not take that long.
46
NCAA Discussion / Re: 2025 NCAA Proposed Rule Changes
« Last post by bossman72 on March 01, 2025, 09:29:13 PM »
Pardon my ignorance, but what is this meant to prevent?

The off-returner will stick his arms straight out to signal the other returner to take a touchback.
I'm not sure why they needed a rule change, they could have interpreted it as an invalid signal like they did with the get away signal.
47
General Discussion / Re: When sports turn to politics.....
« Last post by Ralph Damren on March 01, 2025, 11:13:57 AM »
IMVHO (in my VERY humble opinion) , restricting trans-gender females (genetic males) from competing in female sports does not eliminate them from competing in male sports. The firestorm in Maine evolved from a genetic male who finished 5th in the boy's pole vault last year in the state's indoor track state championship. Competing this year as a female, she won the goal metal. The runner-ups, who had practiced hard for this event were heartbroken. While this is not a top news story nationally, it is hotly debated state wide. Any opinion that I might have is merely the grumblings of a cranky ole' duffer, but here they are.......

+ Maine's gender determation doesn't rely on hormone therapy or chromose counts , but the student can announce their requested gender. Being a fan of Law & Order/SUV, I understand that if a 19 year old had sex with a 17 year old you have saturtary rape as the 17 year old didn't have the maturity to make such a decision. Does a 17 year old have the maturity to decide their gender on a given day?

+ Yes, girls are allowed to play on boy's teams. I've seen several play football over the recent years, often as place kickers who grew up playing soccer. I don't see a problem and look at that like an 8th grader being allowed to play on a varsity team. Our basketball tourney end this weekend and two of the teams have 8th graders on them . On the flapside, allowing a big ole, bubba that graduated last year wouldn't be fair.

+ While Trump only carried 45% of Maine's voters, 80%+ have simular feelings on this issue. To quote Maine's U.S. Congressman, Jerret Golden (D) , " Choose carefully the hill you wish to die on. "

Enough ranting for one day, time to walk ma' hunting dawg  :)....

PS ; REMEMBER BILLIE JEAN KING DEFEATING RENE RICHARDS  pHiNzuP aWaRd
48
NCAA Discussion / Re: 2025 NCAA Proposed Rule Changes
« Last post by ilyazhito on March 01, 2025, 06:53:27 AM »
The "T signal" is a signal to get away from the ball. I have seen it on punts when the return team does not want their own player to touch a bouncing kick and make the other team eligible to recover the ball. I believe that the NCAA rules committee wants to blow dead any play where the return team gives signals that confuse the opponents into believing that the play will be dead.
49
NCAA Discussion / Re: 2025 NCAA Proposed Rule Changes
« Last post by bama_stripes on March 01, 2025, 06:47:24 AM »
Quote
Recommended if any player on a kickoff-return team makes a "T" signal during the kick, the play would be whistled dead.

Pardon my ignorance, but what is this meant to prevent?
50
General Discussion / Re: When sports turn to politics.....
« Last post by ElvisLives on February 28, 2025, 09:27:49 PM »
Elvis, the only one one who I can think of, who probably could have held her own against men playing professionally (in her time), would be Babe  Zaharias, in both golf and track, and probably baseball as well.

No doubt Babe was one of the very best female athletes ever, especially when her accomplishments are weighted for ALL athletes of her time, as compared to athletes of today. Playing from the men’s tees, she qualified and played in 5 PGA tournaments in three different years, and made the 36 hole cuts in at least three of those tournaments, but didn’t threaten the leaders (although many top male players also failed to threaten the leaders). She was clearly the best female player at that time. She then helped found the LPGA.
So, how fair would it have been to have allowed male golfers to play in the LPGA, trans-gender or otherwise? As far as I know, there is nothing keeping females, trans-gender or otherwise, from playing in the PGA. So why don’t they? Easy answer. They can’t compete against genetic males. A trans-gender female (genetic male identifying as a woman, or medically transformed into a woman) might be able to compete. But, I don’t know of any such persons attempting to compete. If there are, they haven’t been publicized, or made any competitive impact on the game.
Would it be fair to allow trans-females (genetic males) to play in the LPGA? Absolutely not.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10