Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10
51
National Federation Discussion / Re: Rule 8 Editorial Changes
« Last post by lawdog on August 28, 2026, 10:00:49 AM »

I like the original there is "no longer a succeeding spot" language.  That is in fact the most accurate description at the time the enforcement option is offered by the R to team A.

But there is no existing spot unless the extra point is made.  So no longer a succeeding spot is factually wrong. It didn't disappear after they decided, it literally never existed.  So it couldn't be less accurate.
52
Texas Topics / Re: Fair Catch Kick
« Last post by ElvisLives on August 27, 2026, 11:34:42 PM »
The bulletin states (multiple times) that the FCK line for the receiving team in sixman football is 10 yards from the kicking team’s line just like 11-man. But the sixman rule variations say it’s 15.

Well, that explains it. Quite stupidly, I was thinking of the NCAA Bulletin 2. Now that I am pointing in the right direction - TASO 2026 Bulletin 1 - I actually DO recall thinking, when I first read it, that the 10-yard offset for 6-player football was different than what I’d previously understood. Knowing the source, I think I was just confident that this was correct, without double checking against the UIL Exceptions. However, I will dig into this to see if this bulletin was coordinated with the UIL. I can understand the logic that, since this is, in fact, NOT a free kick, the 15-yard offset doesn’t apply. On the other hand, we keep telling everybody that the FCK formations are the same as a free kick. For 6-player football, that would mean a 15-yard offset.
Part of the problem is that the UIL Exceptions author/editor is a bit notorious for not vetting the Exceptions thoroughly before releasing them. That’s why there is already a proposed modification for 2027 to make the use of a holder for a FCK optional - not required. But, in this case, 15 yards may, truly, be appropriate.
I’ll get back to you, if I can get some clarification.
53
Texas Topics / Re: Fair Catch Kick
« Last post by Legacy Zebra on August 27, 2026, 09:56:14 PM »
The bulletin states (multiple times) that the FCK line for the receiving team in sixman football is 10 yards from the kicking team’s line just like 11-man. But the sixman rule variations say it’s 15.
54
Texas Topics / Re: Fair Catch Kick
« Last post by ElvisLives on August 27, 2026, 06:48:58 PM »
Since this thread is already here on the TASO forum, I’ll put this here:

Did anybody else catch the error in the bulletin sent out yesterday? I’ll leave it as an exercise for the reader, but I will say this: It was a true rule error and not merely a typo.

Well, I’ve scoured the bulletin. If it has something to do with replay, I probably wouldn’t know, anyway. But, I don’t see whatever it is. Please break the suspense.
55
Texas Topics / Re: Fair Catch Kick
« Last post by ElvisLives on August 27, 2026, 06:45:01 PM »
The "pregnant FB" hiding the ball under one's jersey.  ^flag

This would be my announcement:

“Illegitimate possession. Loss of reputation. Do not repeat the play.”
56
Texas Topics / Re: Fair Catch Kick
« Last post by Ralph Damren on August 27, 2026, 02:02:30 PM »
I still recall the words of NCAA's Steve Shaw when addressing the NFHS RC a couple of years ago. It went sorta' like this : "Most of high school football officials work a game as a hobby and the love of football.  It is important that you make rule changes that are easy to understand and enforce......" yEs:

IMHO, the NFHS FCK rule is simple....just like a kickoff. In my 56 years in the game, it never occurred in any of my games or that I heard of in my state. I do applaud you guys wanting to be ready IF it should occur. :thumbup

Elvis started the lsit with the saftey on a PAT. Allow me to add some more unicorn rules (NFHS version, but I'm sure NCAA has some ,too:

The "pregnant FB" hiding the ball under one's jersey.  ^flag


 
57
Texas Topics / Re: Fair Catch Kick
« Last post by ElvisLives on August 27, 2026, 12:24:15 PM »
Since this thread is already here on the TASO forum, I’ll put this here:

Did anybody else catch the error in the bulletin sent out yesterday? I’ll leave it as an exercise for the reader, but I will say this: It was a true rule error and not merely a typo.

What "...TASO forum,..."?
58
Texas Topics / Re: Fair Catch Kick
« Last post by JasonTX on August 27, 2026, 11:23:38 AM »
Since this thread is already here on the TASO forum, I’ll put this here:

Did anybody else catch the error in the bulletin sent out yesterday? I’ll leave it as an exercise for the reader, but I will say this: It was a true rule error and not merely a typo.

Stop teasing.  What is the issue?  The part about 10-2-5-f not applying in regards to the restraining line being 2 yards into the end zone?
59
National Federation Discussion / Re: Gainesville vs Buford in Georgia
« Last post by AlUpstateNY on August 27, 2026, 11:09:03 AM »
We all should understand, "Stupid is, as Stupid does", but that doesn't mean we should allow "Stupid" to go unchecked.  Mouthpieces have a singular, worthwhile purpose and should be used ONLY for that specific, intended purpose.  Players with "dangling" mouth pieces should be "advised" of their problem, instructed to immediately correct the problem, or leave the playing field (and not return until the problem is corrected.
60
Texas Topics / Re: Fair Catch Kick
« Last post by Legacy Zebra on August 27, 2026, 11:04:38 AM »
Since this thread is already here on the TASO forum, I’ll put this here:

Did anybody else catch the error in the bulletin sent out yesterday? I’ll leave it as an exercise for the reader, but I will say this: It was a true rule error and not merely a typo.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10