if called INC on the field, absolutely no beef with staying with that, but never should have been reversed on replay....nothing clear and obvious there as an error. IMO, that's a perversion of the replay process, re-officiating the play and substituting the booth judgment for the on-field judgment. It's not a sky judge (yet) but that's how it was used. And really unprecedented to my memory on how many senior officiating leaders have publicly commented that it was an incorrect reversal. Not just the TV refs like Terry McCauley and Periera, but as mentioned in the story Bill Carollo and in other stories, Rogers Reddings himself.