Football Officiating > NCAA Discussion

2025 PROP Approval

(1/2) > >>

ETXZebra:
The NCAA Playing Rules Oversight Panel on Wednesday approved modifications to the injury timeout rules in football, beginning with the 2025-26 season.

Under the new rule, if medical personnel enter the field to evaluate an injured player after the ball is spotted by the officiating crew for the next play, that player's team will be charged a timeout.

If the team does not have any timeouts remaining, a 5-yard delay-of-game penalty will be assessed.

The injury timeout proposal was made by the NCAA Football Rules Committee after many in the college football community raised concerns about strategies in which players fake an injury to stop the opposition's momentum or to avoid using an allotted timeout.

This has been a topic of discussion for the NCAA Football Rules Committee in recent years. Before the 2021 season, a framework was instituted that allows a school or conference to request a postgame video review headed by Steve Shaw, the NCAA secretary-rules editor/national coordinator of officials, regarding questionable actions involving injuries.

If it was determined that a player faked an injury to manipulate the rules, the offending team's conference was notified, and any possible disciplinary action could be made by the conference office.

The impetus for the rule change next season is to provide an in-game mechanism that can curtail the faking of injuries because Football Rules Committee members think these actions negatively affect the overall perception of the game.

Overtime timeouts

The panel also approved a rule change regarding overtime timeouts. If a game reaches a third overtime, each team will have one timeout beginning with the third overtime until a winner is determined.

Previously, teams were allotted one timeout for each overtime period. At the start of the third overtime, teams alternate running 2-point plays until a winner is decided.

Football Rules Committee members want to keep the action moving once a game reaches a third extra period.

Other rule changes

The panel approved:

When the decision on instant replay is announced, the referee will only say that the call on the field is "upheld" or "overturned." The terms "confirmed" and "stands" will not be used.

No offensive player can be in the direct line of the snap to the potential kicker or within the frame of the snapper on punts for the formation to qualify as a scrimmage kick formation. If a team is not in scrimmage kick formation, it must have five players numbered 50 through 79 on the line of scrimmage. Additionally, if the snapper is on the end of the line by formation, the snapper will lose scrimmage kick protection, and the opposition can line a player over the snapper.

If any player on a kickoff-return team makes a "T" signal with his arms during the kick, the team gives up the right to return the kick, and the play will be whistled dead.

Enhanced rules regarding simulating action at the snap and words or signals that distract opponents when they are preparing to put the ball in play will also be effective next season. No player can call defensive signals that simulate the sound or cadence of the offensive signals. The defensive terms "move" and "stem" would be reserved for players on that side of the ball and could not be used by the offense.

After the two-minute timeout in either half, if the defense commits a foul with 12 or more players on the field and all the players participate in the play, the officials will administer a 5-yard penalty. The offensive team would have the option to reset the game clock back to the time at the start of the play. If the 12th player is attempting to leave the field and has no influence on the play, the defensive team will be penalized 5 yards with no adjustment to the game clock.

Coach-to-player communication, similar to technology implemented for the Football Bowl Subdivision last year, will be a permissive option for teams that compete in the Football Championship Subdivision.

dammitbobby:

--- Quote from: ETXZebra on April 17, 2025, 11:25:29 AM ---When the decision on instant replay is announced, the referee will only say that the call on the field is "upheld" or "overturned." The terms "confirmed" and "stands" will not be used.

--- End quote ---

What's the benefit of this?

ElvisLives:

--- Quote from: dammitbobby on April 17, 2025, 12:29:26 PM ---What's the benefit of this?

--- End quote ---

It eliminates the debate about having indisputable video evidence to "confirm" a ruling, as opposed to NOT having indisputable video evidence, and letting the ruling "stand."  So, now, when the R announces, "upheld," the TV announcers will automatically assume there was NOT clear video evidence to "overturn," so the ruling is "upheld." That can now apply to EVERY replay review that is not "overturned," eh?

When I was on the field, and we had a review, I was more than muttering "CONFIRMED," "CONFIRMED," "CONFIRMED..."  Days gone by.

ElvisLives:
Regarding the prohibition on Team A of using the words, “move,” and, “stem,” we really need Shaw to issue a clarification that, although those words may only be used by Team B, Team B may still not use those words in a manner that is intended to cause Team A to commit a false start. As we have always known, it isn’t the word(s) that is/are used; it is HOW that word(s) is/are used. If used in a sharp, abrupt manner, that is a disconcerting signal (foul).
With this rule, as presented so far, I guarantee you that defensive coaches will take this as meaning that they can use those words any way they choose. I can hear it now: “But the rule says we can use those words for our defensive shift call!.” Yes, and no, coach. The new rule only prohibits Team A from using those words. It doesn’t change anything about what you, Team B, are allowed to do, or are prohibited from doing. This is a fair trade since you are prohibited from using a ‘clap’ as your signal (or as part of your signal).
Please, Steve. Make the rule read that team B is still prohibited from using these, or any other, words in a manner that is intended to cause a false start.

bossman72:

--- Quote from: ElvisLives on April 17, 2025, 01:50:29 PM ---It eliminates the debate about having indisputable video evidence to "confirm" a ruling, as opposed to NOT having indisputable video evidence, and letting the ruling "stand."  So, now, when the R announces, "upheld," the TV announcers will automatically assume there was NOT clear video evidence to "overturn," so the ruling is "upheld." That can now apply to EVERY replay review that is not "overturned," eh?

When I was on the field, and we had a review, I was more than muttering "CONFIRMED," "CONFIRMED," "CONFIRMED..."  Days gone by.

--- End quote ---

It also speeds up replay because sometimes they would get hung up deciding between confirmed or stands.  Essentially wasting time

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page