Author Topic: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version  (Read 5579 times)

Etref and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Ralph Damren

  • *
  • Posts: 5053
  • FAN REACTION: +874/-28
  • SEE IT-THINK IT-CALL IT
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #75 on: January 15, 2026, 11:50:24 AM »
Their stance - and I agree with it - is the NFHS Board of Directors needs to give their final approval. More than once I've seen an equipment restriction be adjusted to advance the requirement date to reduce the financial burden of the schools replacing now illegal items or suppliers having shelves of unsaleable equipment.   :-X

Offline bama_stripes

  • *
  • Posts: 3155
  • FAN REACTION: +124/-29
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #76 on: January 16, 2026, 06:14:42 AM »
I’m really hopeful that there will be only one or two that impact on-field play.  My old brain can’t handle too many at the same time. cRaZy

FWIW, the baseball change this year was to limit the number of times defensive players can meet with each other to one per inning (a speed-up rule).  Double first base will be required next year (a safety rule).

Offline Ralph Damren

  • *
  • Posts: 5053
  • FAN REACTION: +874/-28
  • SEE IT-THINK IT-CALL IT
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #77 on: January 16, 2026, 07:01:10 AM »
I’m really hopeful that there will be only one or two that impact on-field play.  My old brain can’t handle too many at the same time. cRaZy

FWIW, the baseball change this year was to limit the number of times defensive players can meet with each other to one per inning (a speed-up rule).  Double first base will be required next year (a safety rule).
You're in luck, 'Bama, with your wish  :-X . Snow is still on the ground here in Maine so it'll be a while before I can yell : "PLAY BALL". This will be my 60th and last season behind the mask and plan to lobby for the base ump to track the defensive players' meetings.  ^talk I assume that will often be pitcher and catcher, while it COULD be leftfielder and firstbaseman  :!#.   

Offline Ralph Damren

  • *
  • Posts: 5053
  • FAN REACTION: +874/-28
  • SEE IT-THINK IT-CALL IT
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #78 on: February 04, 2026, 12:05:30 PM »
THE NEW RULES ARE HERE...LETS CHAT  ^talk ^talk ^talk ^talk ^talk

Offline BTP

  • *
  • Posts: 5
  • FAN REACTION: +0/-0
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #79 on: February 04, 2026, 05:12:03 PM »
Re a point of emphasis:

Has any official at any level aided his or her career by calling helping the runner, even correctly?

Offline bossman72

  • *
  • Posts: 2294
  • FAN REACTION: +310/-29
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #80 on: February 04, 2026, 07:52:23 PM »
Well that was anticlimactic...

Online Snapper

  • *
  • Posts: 175
  • FAN REACTION: +17/-2
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #81 on: February 04, 2026, 09:04:42 PM »

Offline bama_stripes

  • *
  • Posts: 3155
  • FAN REACTION: +124/-29
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #82 on: February 05, 2026, 07:17:17 AM »
I’m surprised that they didn’t drop the sweat bands restriction along with allowing play cards on the belt.

Ralph, was there much discussion about full-yardage penalty for DPI?

Offline Ralph Damren

  • *
  • Posts: 5053
  • FAN REACTION: +874/-28
  • SEE IT-THINK IT-CALL IT
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #83 on: February 05, 2026, 08:40:28 AM »
Re a point of emphasis:

Has any official at any level aided his or her career by calling helping the runner, even correctly?
I have a call in to NFHS to learn the aim of the POE on helping the runner and relay it to you guys as soon as I hear. Our current stance in Maine is not to flag the "tush-push" , but to blow it dead with the rationale that the runner's own forward progress has stopped when his teammates begins to push. Our coaches fully understand and don't coach that. 

Offline Ralph Damren

  • *
  • Posts: 5053
  • FAN REACTION: +874/-28
  • SEE IT-THINK IT-CALL IT
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #84 on: February 05, 2026, 09:03:43 AM »
I’m surprised that they didn’t drop the sweat bands restriction along with allowing play cards on the belt.

Ralph, was there much discussion about full-yardage penalty for DPI?

The "sweatband anywhere" proposal made it to the floor for a vote, but failed 28-23 (we need 2/3 to pass = 34). The full yardage penalty failed to come out of it's sub- committee. The proposal was for all fouls and not just DPI.
« Last Edit: February 05, 2026, 11:54:23 AM by Ralph Damren »

Offline ncwingman

  • *
  • Posts: 1445
  • FAN REACTION: +78/-21
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #85 on: February 05, 2026, 11:58:04 AM »
Re a point of emphasis:

Has any official at any level aided his or her career by calling helping the runner, even correctly?

I have called that exactly once.

Middle school game, which means players are at various point of puberty and wildly disparate sizes. Goal line play on the 1, offense calls a QB sneak instead of their usual play of "Hand to the 6' tall running back who is clearly larger than the entire defense combined". 6' tall running back, behind the QB figures he has to do something to help, so he *picks up the QB* and carries him forward through the pile.

Now, did that help my career by calling that? No, that's unlikely.

Offline Ralph Damren

  • *
  • Posts: 5053
  • FAN REACTION: +874/-28
  • SEE IT-THINK IT-CALL IT
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #86 on: February 05, 2026, 12:55:50 PM »
Response from NFHS on HTR POE. The intent is to remind that the 'tush push' isn't allowable in NFHS. If it occurs in a NFHS game, the play should be blown dead as THE RUNNER'S FORWARD PROGRESS has stopped.

While some may be disappointed with the few changes, an 80 year- old member stated : " Rules meetings are like going to the docter's. If there's a lot wrong, you hear : ' Youi need to lose weight, eat better, get more excerise...etc. :puke: ' . If there's little or nothing wrong, you may hear : ' Try parting your hair differently  8] '. There seems to not be alot wrong with our game as is. If 'taint broke ,don't fix 'er. Ayuh, 'spect so. "

Offline lawdog

  • *
  • Posts: 270
  • FAN REACTION: +10/-35
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #87 on: February 05, 2026, 02:40:04 PM »
Well that was anticlimactic...

That's not a bad thing Boss

Offline KWH

  • *
  • Posts: 732
  • FAN REACTION: +641/-114
  • See it, Think about it, Pass on it if possible!
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #88 on: February 05, 2026, 04:11:21 PM »
That's not a bad thing Boss

Oh my, I actually with Law Dog
SEE everything that you CALL, but; Don't CALL everything you SEE!
Never let the Rules Book get in the way of a great ball game!

Respectfully Submitted;
Some guy on a message forum

Offline ncwingman

  • *
  • Posts: 1445
  • FAN REACTION: +78/-21
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #89 on: February 05, 2026, 05:27:11 PM »
Well that was anticlimactic...

I am anticipating the follow up questions in local/regional clinics from the guys who never seem to grasp a rule change, no matter how straightforward.

"So, nobody on the defense can slap a guy in the head?" Nope, nor the offense

"So, the new rule is just the offense? The defense can do it now?" No, nobody can

"But they changed the rule, right?" Yes, so now nobody can

"Nobody on the offense?" Or the defense too!

[Expletive laden 20 minute rant about the free blocking zone deleted]

"What if he slaps in the shoulder, does that count?" *sigh*

Offline Ralph Damren

  • *
  • Posts: 5053
  • FAN REACTION: +874/-28
  • SEE IT-THINK IT-CALL IT
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #90 on: Yesterday at 06:57:46 AM »
OFF THE FIELD....

A cheerleader can stil slap big ole' Bubba's head/face if he becomes  >:D too frisky  >:D.

Offline bama_stripes

  • *
  • Posts: 3155
  • FAN REACTION: +124/-29
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #91 on: Yesterday at 07:59:54 AM »
OFF THE FIELD....

A cheerleader can stil slap big ole' Bubba's head/face if he becomes  >:D too frisky  >:D.

Nowadays, it’s just as likely that the cheerleader is the one being “too frisky”!

Offline bossman72

  • *
  • Posts: 2294
  • FAN REACTION: +310/-29
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #92 on: Yesterday at 09:35:25 AM »
So I have an actual question for this change...

Does this foul encompass "hands to the face" fouls?  If a blocker or defender pins his opponents head back for a prolonged period of time, is that 15 yards under this foul?

Offline SCHSref

  • *
  • Posts: 452
  • FAN REACTION: +15/-10
  • In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #93 on: Yesterday at 01:13:53 PM »
Re a point of emphasis:

Has any official at any level aided his or her career by calling helping the runner, even correctly?

Called it twice last season. Guy was pulling their team's runner forward
If you didn't see it, you can't call it

Offline theride

  • *
  • Posts: 24
  • FAN REACTION: +1/-13
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #94 on: Yesterday at 09:36:12 PM »
The getting rid of half the distance penalty had support for most of the day, but the provision of possibly having a penalty at the end of regulation on a try that would lead to overtime could possibly have a team starting the overtime session on the 1 yard line, which the subcommittee did not support. At one point, this proposal at subcommittee support by a large margin. This proposal will probably return in the future after a couple of edits.

Offline GoodScout

  • *
  • Posts: 509
  • FAN REACTION: +17/-12
Re: SANTA'S WISH LIST....2026 version
« Reply #95 on: Today at 06:50:05 AM »

yEs:

As someone who usually abhors excessive rule changes, I'm thrilled.