Many will disagree. MD adopted a 35-second shot clock for boys' basketball prior to the start of the 2017-18 season, because the stalling in the playoffs was too much for the MD basketball rules committee to take (In MD, girls basketball has had a 30-second shot clock since the 1970s. The boys shot clock has since been reduced to 30 seconds). In addition, Arkansas will experiment with a shot clock, and many other states are considering whether to adopt one.
I understand coaches' and fans' arguments in favor of a shot clock (better pace of game, more offense, rewarding good defense), but I don't believe that anyone has paid attention to officials' arguments in favor of the shot clock (simplified end-of-game officiating, fewer fouls, simplified enforcement of closely guarded and backcourt count rules (NCAA, NBA, and FIBA all use the shot clock as the official timer for the backcourt count, and NBA even uses the shot clock display for the official game clock timepiece. If a shot clock contains game time, it is the official timepiece at any level, NCAA, NBA, or FIBA), and improved transition coverage). These may be the reason why the NBA and USA Basketball have recommended that high school basketball adopt a shot clock.