« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: 1:29 3rd Gilmer v Navasota  (Read 4483 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

tx29

  • Guest
1:29 3rd Gilmer v Navasota
« on: December 21, 2012, 08:01:34 PM »
Two good calls on the play. We have Illegal high contact on B and We have FM on team A at the end of the return. A Question regarding timing of the Penalty by B, which occurred almost simultaneously with the interception.  What if the int had happened, if it could be determined, before the foul was deemed to have occurred?  B would've had Clean hands and could decline offsetting and retain possession.  Is this reviewable if there's a question about the timing of the foul relative to the COP? My league doesn't have replay and I don't want to read 12 tonight.

The crew did lose about :23 seconds when the clock operator took the play off and the deep flank didn't check him.  But overall judgement was good on this tricky play.  :patrioticon:
Logged

bacwood

  • Guest
Re: 1:29 3rd Gilmer v Navasota
« Reply #1 on: December 21, 2012, 08:49:24 PM »
I thought is was pretty clear that the interception took place before the foul, although I could see in real time how it might have been tough to determine.
Logged

tx29

  • Guest
Re: 1:29 3rd Gilmer v Navasota
« Reply #2 on: December 21, 2012, 08:50:44 PM »
I agree, just expounding.
Logged

Offline TXMike

  • *
  • Posts: 8762
  • FAN REACTION: +229/-265
  • When you quit learning you quit living
Re: 1:29 3rd Gilmer v Navasota
« Reply #3 on: December 21, 2012, 09:23:00 PM »
Logged

Offline Joe Stack

  • *
  • Posts: 635
  • FAN REACTION: +33/-46
Re: 1:29 3rd Gilmer v Navasota
« Reply #4 on: December 21, 2012, 09:34:22 PM »
Tough to say the timing is "pretty clear" since it is almost simultaneous.
Logged

Offline JasonTX

  • *
  • Posts: 2905
  • FAN REACTION: +112/-58
Re: 1:29 3rd Gilmer v Navasota
« Reply #5 on: December 21, 2012, 09:52:59 PM »
In live speed I can easily see how they offset these.

On another note, practice, practice, practice your mic skills.  Whether you wear a mic in each game or not, always verbally announce the penalty enforcement so you don't butcher an announcement during a game in which you do wear one.
Logged

Offline Joe Stack

  • *
  • Posts: 635
  • FAN REACTION: +33/-46
Re: 1:29 3rd Gilmer v Navasota
« Reply #6 on: December 21, 2012, 10:17:42 PM »
Agreed. Thought the same thing myself. Also, practice the delay that is on most mics. Not only will you be ready, but it gives you another 3 seconds to think about what you are going to say.
Logged

Offline bama_stripes

  • *
  • Posts: 2940
  • FAN REACTION: +115/-27
Re: 1:29 3rd Gilmer v Navasota
« Reply #7 on: December 22, 2012, 08:10:09 AM »
Any thoughts as to whether White #8 deserved to be ejected?
Logged

Offline Wingmanbp

  • *
  • Posts: 267
  • FAN REACTION: +5/-7
Re: 1:29 3rd Gilmer v Navasota
« Reply #8 on: December 22, 2012, 09:13:03 AM »
White # 8 was the player involved in the accident two days ago!
Logged

Offline Magician

  • *
  • Posts: 1084
  • FAN REACTION: +257/-8
Re: 1:29 3rd Gilmer v Navasota
« Reply #9 on: December 22, 2012, 09:14:47 AM »
I don't have any issues with the crew on this play. He could have given a little more info on the timing of the first foul. I don't believe the high hit was ejection-worthy.
Logged

tx29

  • Guest
Re: 1:29 3rd Gilmer v Navasota
« Reply #10 on: December 22, 2012, 06:12:54 PM »
12 almost taking the kids head off with the FM was pretty flagrant IMO. 
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »