31
NCAA Discussion / Re: 2025 S-B Quiz 10
« Last post by TxJim on November 06, 2025, 12:19:30 PM »#2. Play clock at 40?
I'll agree with your refutations of points 1 and 3 and challenge that #2 was a benefit- It takes a reward away from a defense that worked hard to cover all the receivers and beat out the blockers to reach the quarterback.
I'm not making the ridiculous case that the NCAA doesn't have good rules, or that a few of them could be of benefit at the high school level. But few of them are, and the NFHS Rules Committee's lapdog love for them has done nothing but make it more difficult to officiate the game. If you look at how complicated the NFL and NCAA rulebooks are, you can only imagine how screwed up newer high school officials can be when they start their careers.
1. 40 second play clock - unlike 100% of college game we do not have a visible play clock, strike 1
2. IG exception - that's OK with me
3. Enforcement of Offensive penalties behind LOS - So if a defensive lineman is about to sack the QB 14 yds behind the LOS and gets taken down the neforcement is from the previous spot? Sorry nut that's BS in high school, strike 2.
We're on the edge here and the absurd version of change wording that NFHS comes up with is probably strike 3.
Anyone else wonder why he was in the EZ?? Website list him as a football coach.
How on God's green earth is adoping a rule from a higher level a "disservice" to HS athletes?
That's exactly my point. We at the NFHS level are not the minor league to the NFL. Holding behind the LOS IMHO should reflect the ACTUAL benefit gained by the hold + the 10 yard penalty. The NCAA is IMHO just that, the "minor leagues" for the NFL. Why even have an NFHS rule book if it's just a cut and paste, albeit with garbled language from the NCAA? No need for that and it does our high school athletes a disservice in my opinion. The NFL and the NCAA are driven by the 100's of millions of $ coming from TV rights and must fit their games into a pre-defined box. I've got no need for that at the high school level.
I am happy to concede that the NFHS time and time again tries to get too cute with the way they word rule changes that come from the higher levels, instead of just freaking copying and pasting from the NCAA rule book (although NCAA wording has plenty of issues, too). While that certainly is fair to criticize, it doesn't mean that the rule changes in general are bad just because they come from a higher level.
1. So the 40-second clock is a bad rule change because most schools don't have visible play clocks? That doesn't make any sense. The NFHS has never suggested that schools go out and buy play clocks. If the back judge can time 25 seconds starting on the ready, he/she is perfectly capable of timing 40 seconds starting at the end of the previous play.
1. 40 second play clock - unlike 100% of college game we do not have a visible play clock, strike 1
2. IG exception - that's OK with me
3. Enforcement of Offensive penalties behind LOS - So if a defensive lineman is about to sack the QB 14 yds behind the LOS and gets taken down the neforcement is from the previous spot? Sorry nut that's BS in high school, strike 2.
We're on the edge here and the absurd version of change wording that NFHS comes up with is probably strike 3.