I’m wondering if I’m missing something, but based on NCAA Rule 2-27-9 and 3-5-2d, was Notre Dame’s substitution illegal? I’m basing this on the portion of the rule that requires a substituted player to sit out for a play and once a substitute becomes a player he must play for one play. Multiple players on offense during 3rd down were substituted for and then returned for the eventual 4th down play. Kirby Smart was wrong that you can’t sub 11 for 11, but I do believe he was right that this was an illegal substitution. What am I missing?