RefStripes.com
Football Officiating => NCAA Discussion => Topic started by: TXMike on October 26, 2014, 04:10:46 PM
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73GfPiyoWmI&feature=youtu.be
-
Seems straight forward to me. Int occurred after the interference.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
-
There has long been discussions about DPI (and seems these guys may have been having it themselves) when pass is cut off before getting to an area where might have been catchable by the receiver
-
There was a video play 7-8 years ago somewhat similar to this where the discussion/conclusion was that "the interception made the ball uncatchable". I can't remember the details, but I do remember I used that same philosophy in a 9th grade 7-on-7 game the next spring and it was not popular.
-
There was a video play 7-8 years ago somewhat similar to this where the discussion/conclusion was that "the interception made the ball uncatchable". I can't remember the details, but I do remember I used that same philosophy in a 9th grade 7-on-7 game the next spring and it was not popular.
IIRC, that was in an Auburn game, but I believe the pass was either tipped or knocked down, not intercepted.
-
Is this the one Bama?
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=2593195
-
The place and direction of the contact (a clear grab and hold, or carry as the case was) and the location of the interception both lead me to the conclusion that DPI was correct. The receiver may have been prevented from either fighting for the ball or contesting the interception by the contact. Now, had that been a simple arm bar and nothing else, then yeah, I might have been persuaded to pick up the flag. But if you look at the replay, it was the rule book definition of tackle.
In order for it to be uncatchable when the ball doesn't leave the field of play, it has to be REALLY uncatchable.
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAHL8rCd1RU
Video of the Auburn - LSU play Redding was talking about
-
Yeah, that's the play I was thinking of, pretty sure.
-
Is this the one Bama?
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=2593195
That's it.
-
In the current video, I think it was correct. It looked to me like the receiver took 4 (small) steps after the contact with the DB. If he had been able to take those steps in the other direction, he would have been close enough to maybe get to the ball.