RefStripes.com
Football Officiating => NCAA Discussion => Topic started by: InsideTheStripes on November 29, 2014, 07:18:36 PM
-
While I'm glad the coaches did the right thing here, I'm not sure why they were given the chance.
https://vimeo.com/113175758
-
Guess we can Blame Jameis for that one.
-
Should that be an automatic DQ? Which rule would support that?
-
Should that be an automatic DQ? Which rule would support that?
I would think you could call targeting on this. Used his helmet to hit him in the face.
-
The problem with calling targeting here is that 92 was a substitute, not a player. 9-1-4 specifically says "No player shall..." If you felt this warranted an ejection, the justification would be flagrant unnecessary roughness. Under 9-1-1, all flagrant fouls require disqualification.
-
We flagged a kid for UNS who pushed an opponent on his sideline earlier this season (HS). We didnt eject him, but that was his first.
Not sure why this would be auto unless he punched him. Good job on the crew for getting that.
-
Yeah, just go 9-1-1 on him then? "Before the game, during the game, and between periods, all flagrant fouls require disqualification."
-
Not sure why this would be auto unless he punched him.
It doesn't have to be a punch to be a flagrant foul.
-
It made the CFO post season video.
RR says, "it would have been so much better if the officials had actually ejected the player from the game and announced that he has been disqualified in addition to the personal foul."
-
Is there a way for non CFO officials to see the videos? Looking on Arbiter brings up an authorisation error.
Would be really useful for me as we use NCAA rules (mostly).
-
You can sign up as an CFO official even if you are outside US (I did).