RefStripes.com

Football Officiating => NCAA Discussion => Topic started by: Txgarza on January 02, 2015, 11:09:34 PM

Title: Houston v. Pitt
Post by: Txgarza on January 02, 2015, 11:09:34 PM
On houstons first onside kick, technically should it have been a penalty?  Not all the players were on the line when the kicker was running to kick the ball. Just curious. Thank you.
Title: Re: Houston v. Pitt
Post by: Legacy Zebra on January 02, 2015, 11:16:51 PM
They don't have to be in the line, they just have to have at least one foot inside the line.
Title: Re: Houston v. Pitt
Post by: Txgarza on January 03, 2015, 01:14:14 AM
One player at the bottom of the screen had both feet outside the 5 yd restraint. Possibly another player. Can't recall.
Title: Re: Houston v. Pitt
Post by: mccormicw on January 03, 2015, 09:27:59 PM
http://youtu.be/P-To5nm3pcY
Title: Re: Houston v. Pitt
Post by: Kalle on January 04, 2015, 02:24:31 AM
That isn't even a technicality, that should be a foul even on a deep kick, let alone on an onside one.
Title: Re: Houston v. Pitt
Post by: centexsports on January 04, 2015, 02:48:10 AM
Of all the calls I have seen missed, this is probably the most forgivable.  Officials on the restraining line check their players position (and all were legal).    Then concentration goes to potential off sides.  I can not see even the best official taking his eye off the restraining line on an obvious on-side kick situation. 

This may not even be a technical question but I believe it is a spirit of the rule question.   
Title: Re: Houston v. Pitt
Post by: TXMike on January 04, 2015, 08:07:37 AM
I do not see how the spirit and intent of this rule was violated in this play.  The player was not getting a running start straight downfield which would have resulted in a huge collision due to him having built up so much inertia.  In fact, the player is not even involved in the play at all.  If anything he put himself at a disadvantage by his movement.
Title: Re: Houston v. Pitt
Post by: bossman72 on January 05, 2015, 12:10:11 PM
Are you referring to #2 on the kicking team??  Too technical... I would not have called him for being past the 5 yd belt.
Title: Re: Houston v. Pitt
Post by: Magician on January 05, 2015, 12:29:58 PM
In the spirit of the rule I would not consider that a foul. It's good for discussion purposes though and I would love to hear RR provide the same guidance.