RefStripes.com
Football Officiating => NCAA Discussion => Topic started by: ump_ben on September 09, 2019, 04:37:32 PM
-
Anybody have anything here:
https://twitter.com/ESPNCFB/status/1170490015467679745?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1170490015467679745&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fsports.yahoo.com%2Fbyu-defender-shows-off-his-arm-with-tennessee-qb-jarrett-guarantanos-cleat-013451016.html
-
UNS could be argued. Probably a stern talking and tight rope for that player.
-
I would think throwing the shoe of an opposing player would surely provoke ill will. Also, even though the player can play without his shoe, he will likely miss a play retrieving and putting it on which seems unfair IMO.
-
I would think throwing the shoe of an opposing player would surely provoke ill will. Also, even though the player can play without his shoe, he will likely miss a play retrieving and putting it on which seems unfair IMO.
Precisely why this should be UNS.
-
I would think throwing the shoe of an opposing player would surely provoke ill will. Also, even though the player can play without his shoe, he will likely miss a play retrieving and putting it on which seems unfair IMO.
The WH held the ready for play until he had it back on.
-
Definitely UNS.
-
The WH held the ready for play until he had it back on.
for what it's worth, regarding UNS if it was tossed at the player: it was tossed in the direction of the shoe wearer's bench...it probably made it to the bench area too. maybe he was a former discus thrower.
-
Maybe he threw it because it smelled horrible. yEs:
-
(https://media.giphy.com/media/5wFS6a1PE62lKUWXyx/giphy.gif)