RefStripes.com

Football Officiating => General Discussion => Topic started by: Ralph Damren on April 18, 2022, 06:51:02 AM

Title: Your take on the USFL
Post by: Ralph Damren on April 18, 2022, 06:51:02 AM
The players looked like players......

     The officials looked like officials.....

         The fans looked like empty seats......

The crowds seemed bigger during the pandemic ,  did anyone know there was a game being played  ??? ???. The  Celts, Bruins and Sox were also playing...I did not watch football long  :puke:

What say you ??  :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: (7-man crew)
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: HLinNC on April 18, 2022, 07:04:34 AM
The problem with playing in a central location yet using city names for the teams.  The Birmingham Stallions drew fairly well Saturday night.
Playing the rest of the games on Easter Sunday in the South, which is still a pretty big deal with church and family dinners for some, wasn't a great idea either.

The games all appeared to be close and a couple went down to the end of the game.

I just don't think that an alt league that the NFL is not obviously backing will make it.
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: Ralph Damren on April 18, 2022, 09:17:15 AM
The problem with playing in a central location yet using city names for the teams.  The Birmingham Stallions drew fairly well Saturday night.
Playing the rest of the games on Easter Sunday in the South, which is still a pretty big deal with church and family dinners for some, wasn't a great idea either.

The games all appeared to be close and a couple went down to the end of the game.

I just don't think that an alt league that the NFL is not obviously backing will make it.
I agree, HLinNC, it sorta' seemed like singing Christmas Carols at Easter  :!# ! In the late 60's I lived in Hartford. The Hartford Knights, of the Continental Football League, lived in Hartford then. They were affiliated with the Buffalo Bills...sorta' like their minor league. They drew well then as many fans looked at the players as possible stars of the future. I'm not sure that the fans can get such a grasp on the USFL players as the NFL will be treated as a rival , not a parent club. Competing with NBA and NHL playoffs, along with MLB, probably won't be a good draw to the average sports fan.  :bOW
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: ElvisLives on April 18, 2022, 09:53:42 AM
I can't wait until an upset player swats that dang drone outta the air. Just gimmicks that serve to do nothing but promote the television network. They do nothing for the game, itself. And get that dang cameraman off the frickin' field. Geez. Amateurs.
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: KWH on April 18, 2022, 11:17:21 AM

I just want to see a 3-point try!
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: Ralph Damren on April 18, 2022, 12:01:58 PM
Along with a replay official, do they also have a censorship official  P_S :o :-X ? With both players and coaches mic'd live, one of those seven  >:D 'naughty'  >:D words will surely slip in the heat of battle  :puke: Parents may be advised that this game is rated :PG-13 and mute is advised for those younger as 'closed-caption' will only show the Queen's English. P_S
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: HLinNC on April 18, 2022, 12:24:23 PM
There should be a built in delay just like any other broadcast.

It was refreshing listening to Mike Riley Saturday night repeatedly saying "gosh darnit".  I thought I was watching Happy Days.
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: Ralph Damren on April 18, 2022, 01:31:43 PM
Being of the season, I recall after the Boston Marathon massacre. The city of Boston was on a full lockdown, canceling a Red Sox game. After the bad guy was caught  P_S, the Sox were back in business. In pre-game, the governor, mayor and a player - Big Papi - were to speak . gov and mayor did fine tiphat: tiphat:. Then came Big Papi " THIS IS OUR F >:D >:D >:D >:D >:D >:D CITY, BOSTON,STRONG" tR:oLl.Out over the airwaves it went, the Sox Jerry Remy responded" Er.... I don't know if I would have put it QUITE like that... :-[ !"

Later that evening ,the commissioner of the FCC spoke to say that normally such a censorship flaw would have drawn a heavy fine to the network. Rarely are exceptions made, one was made that day.

I, too, assume that the USFL has a time delay with a grammar school teacher at the bleep button. Celts, Bruins, Sox and my own baseball umping will be my sports time, and of course, chatting with you guys  :).
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: AlUpstateNY on April 18, 2022, 02:17:09 PM

Later that evening ,the commissioner of the FCC spoke to say that normally such a censorship flaw would have drawn a heavy fine to the network. Rarely are exceptions made, one was made that day.

I, too, assume that the USFL has a time delay with a grammar school teacher at the bleep button. Celts, Bruins, Sox and my own baseball umping will be my sports time, and of course, chatting with you guys  :).

Somewhere. some time ago the sausage industry decided it wasn't a great idea to advertise the ALL inner details of exactly how sausage  was made.  A concept that seems to apply as well to a game where highly competitive adults engage in aggressive physical interaction.  Sometimes too much detail is simply too much detail.
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: stevegarbs on April 18, 2022, 02:28:49 PM
Was I seeing things or did they have multiple cameramen on the field during live action? I know I know I saw a ground-level camera about five yards in front of and to the side of the place kicker on the opening kickoff, and thought I saw other cameramen in the middle of the field during scrimmage downs (not drones, hand-held cameras being carried by people). Did anyone else see it? I wonder what the rules and mechanics are for those additional obstacles?
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: Ralph Damren on April 19, 2022, 07:24:36 AM
Was I seeing things or did they have multiple cameramen on the field during live action? I know I know I saw a ground-level camera about five yards in front of and to the side of the place kicker on the opening kickoff, and thought I saw other cameramen in the middle of the field during scrimmage downs (not drones, hand-held cameras being carried by people). Did anyone else see it? I wonder what the rules and mechanics are for those additional obstacles?
TV shows and movies, with all the special effects and realistic props, etc are enjoyable and believable . The Goodyear blimp was one thing, but with drones flying thru pass patterns and cameramen in both backfields, makes this more of a production than a game. In 2005, Maine's horror author , Stephen King filmed Empire Falls in Maine. It stared Paul Newman, Ed Harris and Helen Hunt AND had a 0:00.15 scene of a football game...remind me to tell you guys about that some day..... :puke:
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: AlUpstateNY on April 19, 2022, 07:36:58 AM
Woke up this morning to about 3" of snow covering everything, after the power came back on.  Maybe it's just too early for "Spring" football even with lots of shiny new innovations.
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: stevegarbs on April 19, 2022, 09:23:38 AM
TV shows and movies, with all the special effects and realistic props, etc are enjoyable and believable . The Goodyear blimp was one thing, but with drones flying thru pass patterns and cameramen in both backfields, makes this more of a production than a game. In 2005, Maine's horror author , Stephen King filmed Empire Falls in Maine. It stared Paul Newman, Ed Harris and Helen Hunt AND had a 0:00.15 scene of a football game...remind me to tell you guys about that some day..... :puke:


Thanks, Ralph. Over the course of my career I was involved in two games that had camera crews in and around the field filming for documentary purposes. Had some camera positioning issues pre-game (What do you mean we can't have a camera platform tripod set up in the end zone?) but overall it was a positive experience. Would like to hear your stories when you get the chance.
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: dammitbobby on April 19, 2022, 10:38:47 AM
Woke up this morning to about 3" of snow covering everything, after the power came back on.  Maybe it's just too early for "Spring" football even with lots of shiny new innovations.

Must be a regional thing, supposed to be 96 here tomorrow. 
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: Ralph Damren on April 19, 2022, 12:59:59 PM
Spring's answer to a Nor'easter. Plenty of  rain - 1.5-2 inches, plenty of wind - 45-50 MPH, some snow - 1 inch. NO BASEBALL TODAY
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: Ralph Damren on April 19, 2022, 02:44:20 PM


Thanks, Ralph. Over the course of my career I was involved in two games that had camera crews in and around the field filming for documentary purposes. Had some camera positioning issues pre-game (What do you mean we can't have a camera platform tripod set up in the end zone?) but overall it was a positive experience. Would like to hear your stories when you get the chance.
The movie casting took 2 local high school football teams, 4 football officials and a grandstand of screaming kids. I watched the officials from afar as a range war quickly developed. Many wanted to become a 'movie star' , but how could the four  ^TD ^TD ^TD ^TD be chosen  ??? ??? ??? ???. I quickly announced that I only handle rules 1-10 and this was rule 11 8] . The football game scene was Ed Harris making out with Helen Hunt who was Paul Newman's wife. The football game was in the background. The players, coaches and officials were on the set for about 6 hours, mostly just standing around.The footage of the game lasted about 15 seconds. The officials were paid $50. for being extras, our game fee then was $60.

IF YOU WISH TO BE A 'MOVIE STAR' ,THINK BEFORE YOU SIGN  tR:oLl :puke:
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: KWH on April 19, 2022, 03:24:47 PM
USFL Rule differences:

On a Try Team A may attempt:
* A 1-point Field Goal snapped from the 15-yard line, or;
* A 2-point Touchdown snapped from the 2-yard line, or;
* A 3-point Touchdown snapped from the 10-yard line
Note: Should Team B score a touchdown (defensive conversion) during any try attempt,  Team B is awarded 2-points

Teams can attempt to retain the football after a try by choosing:
* A traditional onside kick attempt from the A-25 yard line, or;
* 4th and 12 from the A-33 yard line. If A earns a first down, A retains possession, otherwise, B takes possession at the deadball spot.

I like the 3-point try
I like the 4th and 12 replacement for the Onside Kick (I would prefer 4th and 12 from the A-38? - easier to set up and everyone would know Team A needs to get to the 50?)

While some may disagree, I would support these changes in NFHS

 
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: Grant - AR on April 19, 2022, 03:31:11 PM
* 4th and 12 from the A-33 yard line. If A earns a first down, A retains possession, otherwise, B takes possession at the deadball spot.

I'm pretty sure a similar rule change was proposed several years ago in the NCAA.  I seem to remember Greg Schiano proposing it while he was still at Rutgers (I could definitely be wrong on this though).  I think his proposal was something like 4th and 15 from the 30 yard line.  Team A could either go for it or punt it (since they said punts were much safer or had fewer injuries).  If they made it, they kept the ball.  If they didn't make it, Team B took over at the dead ball spot.  I thought it was a pretty good idea since they were trying to make kickoffs less dangerous.
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: Ralph Damren on April 20, 2022, 06:55:44 AM
I wouldn't mind the 3-point PAT, but I wouldn't be in favor of moving the PAT kick back. The kick now is far from automatic and why make it harder ? A defensive score on a PAT has never been on my wish list  :(. Possibly an Ivy League math major could calibrate the success rate of a conventional onside kick and pare it with the success rate of a 4th & ___ scrimmage down.

Questions to ponder.....
 Would K need to be in scrimmage kick formation  ??? ??? ?
  If R blocked the kick, would the ball remain alive  ??? ??? ?
   If B fouled on this 'go for broke' play, would A gain possession  ??? ??? ?
    Would it just be easier just to give B the ball at the 30/35/40 like in many scrimmages  ???

Remember, in the early daze of basketball, a jump ball was held after each basket...someone finally said , let's just give the ball to the other team. In our game, how would K/A be able to get the ball back after they scored, one might ask ? ...By playing good defense, another might answer  :thumbup.
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: AlUpstateNY on April 20, 2022, 09:17:33 AM
USFL Rule differences:

Teams can attempt to retain the football after a try by choosing:
* A traditional onside kick attempt from the A-25 yard line, or;
* 4th and 12 from the A-33 yard line. If A earns a first down, A retains possession, otherwise, B takes possession at the deadball spot.

I like the 3-point try
I like the 4th and 12 replacement for the Onside Kick (I would prefer 4th and 12 from the A-38? - easier to set up and everyone would know Team A needs to get to the 50?)

While some may disagree, I would support these changes in NFHS

On the 2 "4th & 12" options, how would the precise LTG spot be established (and subsequently determined) if measurement was necessary?
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: ncwingman on April 20, 2022, 09:23:52 AM
Especially in high school, there's no reason to make kicks harder. As it is, kick tries in JV games are exceedingly rare around me because if the team has a decent kicker, he's on Varsity and the JV team just goes for two every time.

The 3 point try feels a bit gimmicky to me though. Not to say I wouldn't eventually come around, but I'm not sold yet.

I wouldn't mind seeing the Schiano proposal make an attempt somewhere though. There would need to be some sort of study (or a lot of trial an error) at determining where to put the ball/LTG. If it's a 10+ yard situation, I could see that being difficult for a lot of middling to average high school teams, but you wouldn't want to make it too easy for the really good teams.

Also, if it's a complete mismatch -- 12 time consecutive state champion vs. Little Sisters of the Poor -- LSP could *literally* never get possession of the ball if they couldn't stop that play. You'd probably need a mercy rule caveat.
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: ElvisLives on April 20, 2022, 10:54:51 AM
On the 2 "4th & 12" options, how would the precise LTG spot be established (and subsequently determined) if measurement was necessary?

Al, no different than a touchback, which is set by rule, 1/10, B-20 (which then becomes the A-20). The LTG is precisely 10 yards in advance, i.e., the A-30. If a subsequent dead ball spot is touching the back edge of the A-30, or beyond, with Team A in possession, - first down.

So, for 4/12 at the A-33, by rule, then the LTG is precisely 12 yards in advance, i.e., the A-45. So, if Team A advances the ball to the near edge of the A-45, with Team A in possession, - first down.
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: Kalle on April 20, 2022, 02:07:24 PM
So, for 4/12 at the A-33, by rule, then the LTG is precisely 12 yards in advance, i.e., the A-45. So, if Team A advances the ball to the near edge of the A-45, with Team A in possession, - first down.

And I'm willing to bet that the yard lines and the LTG have been selected exactly for the ease of measurement, as the A-45 is a full yard line. No unambiguity in determining the outcome (unless of course you have weird penalties enforced before the play, but these would have to be really weird to make the LTG to be a non-five yarder).
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: ElvisLives on April 20, 2022, 02:38:18 PM
And I'm willing to bet that the yard lines and the LTG have been selected exactly for the ease of measurement, as the A-45 is a full yard line. No unambiguity in determining the outcome (unless of course you have weird penalties enforced before the play, but these would have to be really weird to make the LTG to be a non-five yarder).

Weird? What's weird about the USFL?  :)
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: KWH on April 20, 2022, 05:03:40 PM

Full Disclosure:
I didn't mean to suggest, if, this were to be proposed in NFHS that we could move the kick-try line?

Rather:

* 1-point Field Goal would be put in play at the 3-yard line
* 2-point Touchdown would be put in play at the 3-yard line
* 3-point Touchdown would be put in play at the 10-yard line
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: Ralph Damren on April 23, 2022, 02:43:29 PM
What ever happened to the "BRING BACK THE DROP KICK" crowd  :o ! I figured that would have been added with an extra point or such  :thumbup .
 :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR:
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: KWH on April 25, 2022, 09:35:53 AM
What ever happened to the "BRING BACK THE DROP KICK" crowd  :o ! I figured that would have been added with an extra point or such  :thumbup .
 :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR: :sTiR:

How about these options Ralph?

Proposed NFHS Try options

* 1-point place-kick field goal try would be put in play at the 3-yard line
* 2-point touchdown try would be put in play at the 3-yard line
New * 3-point drop-kick field goal try would be put in play at the 3-yard line
New * 3-point touchdown try would be put in play at the 10-yard line
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: Ralph Damren on April 25, 2022, 10:25:36 AM
How about these options Ralph?

Proposed NFHS Try options

* 1-point place-kick field goal try would be put in play at the 3-yard line
* 2-point touchdown try would be put in play at the 3-yard line
New * 3-point drop-kick field goal try would be put in play at the 3-yard line
New * 3-point touchdown try would be put in play at the 10-yard line
I'd vote for that  :). I place for soccer goalies that couldn't make a save  ^TD
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: ElvisLives on April 25, 2022, 10:45:39 AM
Forget the rules. Sell some tickets, and then worry about the rules. Even Birmingham ain't exactly packin' 'em in. More people at a birthday party for a 6-year old than for any of the other games. But, it appears some crews are getting more than one game per weekend. If the checks aren't bouncing, two games per week might be a good thing.
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: KWH on April 26, 2022, 01:00:20 PM
I'd vote for that  :). I place for soccer goalies that couldn't make a save  ^TD

OK - Would you also support it if we added 2-points for a defensive conversion?  :!#
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: Ralph Damren on April 26, 2022, 02:56:45 PM
OK - Would you also support it if we added 2-points for a defensive conversion?  :!#
Only if a runner could go airborne by grabbing onto a low flying drone and then parachute into the end zone. In my daze of youth , we used to play tackle football without any adult supervision on the local high school field with no barb-wired fence or disclaimer/warning signs. The game would usually last until suppertime with the last play for each team being a "I KNOW NO BOUNDS " where the runner could leave the field of play, running behind the bleachers, bomb shelters, hula hoops and the likes. His only goal was to make it to the end zone before getting tackled. Only one rule : Can't use any mode of transportation (bikes, roller skates, ponies, trollies  etc) to git there. If the USFL was to adopt this, the boundary  should be set at the stadium parking lot. Fans in isle seats could be placed in danger and a disclaimer on the reverse side of the ticket should explain such.

EDITORIAL NOTE: These are only musings of a tired and grumpy ole' duffer, returning from a spring cleaning of our lakeside cottage and not a suggestion or proposal for NFHS rules. Leaving school property during a school function could cause a liability issue.  8]

 :sTiR:
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: Ralph Damren on June 23, 2022, 07:25:10 AM
In this era of '24/7' coverage of everything, I'm afraid sometimes topics get quite obscure. The other night there was a riveting discussion on a local sports radio station regarding the current pay scale of the USFL......

It was stated that the minimum player's  salary is $600/game BUT the players all have to stay in a league-owned hotel . If they choose to have a roommate, each are charged $75/night  :!#. If my math is correct, that sounds like $525 of your paycheck would leave a player with $75 spending money  :o  :puke:

The talking heads also went on to say that if the USFL makes a profit ,after three years, teams from far away cities may come to play , not just local teams with names from far away cities  tiphat:

I quickly turned off the radio and went back to sleep. 8] In the morning, I pondered : (1) Was this just a bad dream  ??? , (2) "fake news" :puke: , (3) A remake of the movie....

THEY SHOOT HORSES, DON'T THEY ? -I don't think Jane Fonda would star in this one  :!#
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: Ralph Damren on February 18, 2023, 08:40:33 AM
WE ARE A MERE FEW WEEKS FROM THE USFL SEASON-OPENING KICKOFF  tR:oLl

Do any of you know if they have pre-season games and will they be televised  ??? ???

Where nearly all the teams claim to be from places that they are not really from, the USFL could hold an auction to their fans to rename those teams and raise some needed $$$...

If I was to bid, Estcourt Station (Maine's northern-most town) probably would be my choice. However, part of Estcourt Station is in Canada and can only be reached by a road from Canada.I'm unsure if the USFL is ready for international exposure. I am sure, that not being a USFL fan, I would not bid in such an event.
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: dammitbobby on February 18, 2023, 09:19:47 AM
When I went to school in Scotland, there was a football club named Partick Thistle in Glasgow that got relegated from the top flight all the way down to the bottom... the top two teams, Celtic and Rangers, absolutely hate each other, (violently at times) and when challenged, oftentimes people would say they were a Partick Thistle supporter to get out of the situation (and possibly evoke sympathy).  Every once in a while you'd see a jersey, but not often.


 I'd love to see the Estcourt Station <insert mascot> being a viable contender/answer when asked who someone's favorite team is.

Just because.
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: HLinNC on February 18, 2023, 11:57:53 AM
Ralph, I think Fox and NBC are the two networks carrying USFL.  I imagine a lot of the games will wind up on their cable or streaming channels. 
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: Ralph Damren on February 18, 2023, 12:18:09 PM
When I went to school in Scotland, there was a football club named Partick Thistle in Glasgow that got relegated from the top flight all the way down to the bottom... the top two teams, Celtic and Rangers, absolutely hate each other, (violently at times) and when challenged, oftentimes people would say they were a Partick Thistle supporter to get out of the situation (and possibly evoke sympathy).  Every once in a while you'd see a jersey, but not often.


 I'd love to see the Estcourt Station <insert mascot> being a viable contender/answer when asked who someone's favorite team is.

Just because.
The Maine side of the border has a population of four in Estcourt Station. If there were a mascot, I would say it was the Sled Dawgs as ,without driving thru Canada, the closest Maine town - Allagash - can only be reached by dog sleds or snowmobiles in the Winter. Their 'team motto' could be : "ONLY THE LEAD DOG IN A DOG SLED HAS A CHANGE OF SCENERY.  cRaZy
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: Ralph Damren on February 18, 2023, 12:35:16 PM
Ralph, I think Fox and NBC are the two networks carrying USFL.  I imagine a lot of the games will wind up on their cable or streaming channels.
Thanks, HL, but our CBS affiliate often carries Law & Order reruns . An other activity for we Mainers will be watching the mud dry  :).
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: GA Umpire on February 18, 2023, 07:07:47 PM
WE ARE A MERE FEW WEEKS FROM THE USFL SEASON-OPENING KICKOFF  tR:oLl


I have not seen it mentioned here, but the XFL starts tonight.  ESPN.
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: Ralph Damren on February 19, 2023, 05:44:31 AM
I have not seen it mentioned here, but the XFL starts tonight.  ESPN.
Is it live or reruns of their short lifespan  ??? If reruns, a sharp bookie  could profit from an unsharp football junkie  :!# . As I recall, the highlight of the XFL games was, in lieu of a coin toss, two opposing big ole' Bubbas would dive for a loose football.
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: GA Umpire on February 19, 2023, 04:27:36 PM
Is it live or reruns of their short lifespan  ??? If reruns, a sharp bookie  could profit from an unsharp football junkie  :!# . As I recall, the highlight of the XFL games was, in lieu of a coin toss, two opposing big ole' Bubbas would dive for a loose football.
The XFL is live football and started this weekend.
Below is a link to their rules modifications.

https://www.xfl.com/rules

The kickoffs are very different this season.


Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: Ralph Damren on February 20, 2023, 06:36:19 AM
The XFL is live football and started this weekend.
Below is a link to their rules modifications.

https://www.xfl.com/rules

The kickoffs are very different this season.
That does spur my interest to at least watch the opening kickoff. I love sports and football is at the top of my list BUT THE New England Bruins are 42-8 (best in NHL) and THE New England Celtics are
42-17 (best in  NBA) . The Sox are in spring training and I'm preparing for my umpiring as soon as the mud dries. My football will be mostly chattting with you guys and a state coaches clinic coming up in a few weeks. Chatting with you guys is more fun  :).
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: Ralph Damren on February 26, 2023, 10:50:01 AM
ESPN 4 PM EST  2/26

XFL game -somebody plays somebody...stay tuned.../.
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: Ralph Damren on February 26, 2023, 03:59:05 PM
Orlando vs SA, watched the first period.  Mutterings of an ole' duffer.....

Sorta' like watching two unranked college teams - some players claim to fame was once drafted by NFL.
They didn't show 'coin toss' which used to be two big ole' Bubbas diving for a loose ball.
It appeared to be three officials in the backfield- the ref(wearing an adjustable hat), guy with red hat and lady with a ponytail.
Kickoffs seemed confusing.
Fans all sat on one side of the stadium.
Will USFL play XFL for some kind of championship ??

.....but it is football

Time to walk my hunting dawg before the sun sets.....
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: HLinNC on February 26, 2023, 04:09:15 PM
Red hat's job is to spot the football, no other job.  They are using 7 person crews with 1 RO and 1 X (ball spotter).  All XFL officials are FBS level.

Striped t-shirts look cheesy. 

Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: Ralph Damren on February 26, 2023, 07:55:11 PM
Red hat's job is to spot the football, no other job.  They are using 7 person crews with 1 RO and 1 X (ball spotter).  All XFL officials are FBS level.

Striped t-shirts look cheesy.
The striped tee shirts along with the adjustable hats make the officials resemble what one might see on a Pop Warner field.
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: HLinNC on February 27, 2023, 09:34:51 AM
Quote
adjustable hats

More maddening- the referee (white) hats were all adjustable as were the female officials.  (The NFL just went to adjustable caps for the ladies this past season, ostensibly so they didn't have to keep tucking ponytails  up in their cap.).  The ball spotters (red hats) and male non-referees were all wearing sized/solid back caps.  The uniforms look cheap, save the pants.  The former Alliance league unis were a bit gaudy but at least still looked official.

Under Armour is obviously the uniform sponsor but they screwed the pooch on this rig.  One would think Dean Blandino would have had more influence than that.
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: Ralph Damren on May 02, 2023, 07:51:33 AM
Will there be a playoff between the XFL & USFL to see who's the best of....whatever ??

last question....

Would the best of these two leagues be able to compete with the worst NFL team ??
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: ElvisLives on May 02, 2023, 08:52:38 AM
Will there be a playoff between the XFL & USFL to see who's the best of....whatever ??

last question....

Would the best of these two leagues be able to compete with the worst NFL team ??

Remember when a group of college all-stars would play an NFL team? (Yes, that used to happen, but those days are looooong gone, and ain't never coming back). The All-Stars competed, but were just out-classed. I think a USFL/XFL vs NFL second level team would be much like that.
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: HLinNC on May 02, 2023, 10:10:07 AM
Quote
Remember when a group of college all-stars would play an NFL team?

The last game was in '76.  It got called due to a t-storm with torrential rain.  It was starting to die before that as NFL coaches didn't want their star rookie draft choices playing in it.
Title: Re: Your take on the USFL
Post by: riffraft on May 02, 2023, 03:33:21 PM
Remember when a group of college all-stars would play an NFL team? (Yes, that used to happen, but those days are looooong gone, and ain't never coming back). The All-Stars competed, but were just out-classed. I think a USFL/XFL vs NFL second level team would be much like that.

1963 the college All-Stars beat the Green Bay Packers