RefStripes.com

Football Officiating => NCAA Discussion => Topic started by: bama_stripes on November 04, 2024, 06:59:21 AM

Title: UF-UGA Targeting & Review
Post by: bama_stripes on November 04, 2024, 06:59:21 AM

1:26 remaining, 2nd Q. Florida 10, Georgia 3.

Georgia #7 is flagged for targeting, and the call is overturned after review.  The referee’s announcement was: “After video review, there was no foul for targeting.  A video review inside of 2 minutes also includes a 10-second runoff. Georgia has elected to use their second time out to prevent a runoff.”

While I’m sure they got the rule right, why is there a zap-10 provision in this scenario?  It wasn’t their fault that play was stopped, since all targeting fouls are reviewed.

Title: Re: UF-UGA Targeting & Review
Post by: dammitbobby on November 04, 2024, 08:28:51 AM

Similar play discussed here from a while back.

https://www.refstripes.com/forum/index.php?topic=17140.msg173331#msg173331

Title: Re: UF-UGA Targeting & Review
Post by: bama_stripes on November 04, 2024, 04:30:23 PM

Thanks.  I obviously don’t read all the NCAA threads, since I don’t work games under that rule set.