RefStripes.com
Football Officiating => NCAA Discussion => Topic started by: NVFOA_Ump on September 12, 2012, 08:52:59 PM
-
3rd and short at the 50 yard line. Team A is running a single wing offense with all 11 players in the box. Team B is in a very tight defense with all 11 players within 3 yards of the LOS.
Back A-21 takes a direct snap and breaks off tackle and is immediately in the open heading for a TD when A-81 who was the opposite side TE starts looking for someone to hit. He picks B-56 who is just getting back up at the 48 yard line after diving in an attempt to tackle A-21 who by now is crossing the 20 yard line on his way for a TD.
A-81 contacts B-56 from the blind side with a violent shoulder hit and puts him on the deck and tops that off with some verbal BS directed at B-56 who is now on the ground. Flag is thrown at the 48 yard line as A-21 is now around the 10 yard line before finishing his run in the EZ.
What's the enforcement here?
-
Live ball PF, 3 and 1, spot of the foul enforcement.
-
Live ball PF, 3 and 1, spot of the foul enforcement.
Sounds like there is a UNS foul too, which should be noted, even if the penalty for that is declined (only one can be enforced as both are live ball fouls now).
-
Sounds like there is a UNS foul too, which should be noted, even if the penalty for that is declined (only one can be enforced as both are live ball fouls now).
Thats what I was thinking. Double whammy for the PF and UNS
-
UNS is a non-contact foul so this is PF. I do agree that the rules should include a provision for counting this type of PF to count towards the two that get a player tossed.
Best regards,
Brad
-
This result is a consequence of last year's rule change. We now have unsportsmanlike fouls that may not be penalized due to their live-ball nature.
The number of the player still needs to be noted in case he commits another. If this is his second, he's ejected.
-
UNS is a non-contact foul so this is PF.
Isn't the UNS for the "verbal BS" after the play?