Author Topic: Rules as seen on TV  (Read 220 times)

Offline ncwingman

  • *
  • Posts: 493
  • FAN REACTION: +28/-2
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Rules as seen on TV
« on: January 16, 2018, 11:13:11 AM »
With the stipulation that I am not part of any sort of rule committee and that whatever said here will never be taken seriously by anyone... what NCAA/NFL rules would you actually like to see incorporated into Fed rules?

We've all seen and lamented changes that happened just because the big boys do it, but which rules do you think would actually help?

One caveat -- the "help" must affect the actual game, not just to prevent assistant coaches from yelling absurd things like "He was out of the tackle box!" by making it a legitimate claim. Granted, I think that allowing the QB to throw the ball away would be a useful addition to prevent taking a hit (either that or actually enforce IG when he throws the ball into the 6th row or 50 feet in the air, even if it came within a quarter mile of an eligible receiver)

Offline bossman72

  • *
  • Posts: 1161
  • FAN REACTION: +52/-21
Re: Rules as seen on TV
« Reply #1 on: January 16, 2018, 11:30:40 AM »
Here are some changes I have in the arsenal that I need to submit to my state office next year.  Some are more important than others.

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzA-T4I9Rwu4WEdnYUp1TkFHNFU

Offline FLAHL

  • *
  • Posts: 659
  • FAN REACTION: +41/-7
Re: Rules as seen on TV
« Reply #2 on: January 16, 2018, 12:51:48 PM »
Here are some changes I have in the arsenal that I need to submit to my state office next year.  Some are more important than others.


Nice work Bossman.  Getting clarification on whether an airborne player is in bounds or out of bounds is long overdue.
"Never argue with stupid people.  They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience." - Mark Twain

Offline prab

  • *
  • Posts: 529
  • FAN REACTION: +33/-35
  • Wherever you go, there you are!
Re: Rules as seen on TV
« Reply #3 on: January 16, 2018, 02:23:00 PM »
Nice work Bossman.  Getting clarification on whether an airborne player is in bounds or out of bounds is long overdue.

Changing the definition for the in/out of bounds status of an airborne player is so logical as to make one wonder why it hasn't happened already.  I would word it a bit differently than Bossman to include ground, pylon or goalpost, to eliminate the possibility that an enterprising coach (remember the offense which shall not be named) could design a play where a receiver in the back of the end zone could leap from the end zone, push off of the goal post on the way up and then bat the pass backward to a teammate. 

The current rule implies that an airborne player is "out of bounds" or "not out of bounds" but doesn't say anything about inbounds.   This is "not so logical" (bad pun intended).

Prediction - the rule will remain unchanged but there will be an increased emphasis placed on making sure that jersey numbers are at least 8" and 10" on the front and back respectively.

Offline bossman72

  • *
  • Posts: 1161
  • FAN REACTION: +52/-21
Re: Rules as seen on TV
« Reply #4 on: January 16, 2018, 03:16:26 PM »
Changing the definition for the in/out of bounds status of an airborne player is so logical as to make one wonder why it hasn't happened already.  I would word it a bit differently than Bossman to include ground, pylon or goalpost, to eliminate the possibility that an enterprising coach (remember the offense which shall not be named) could design a play where a receiver in the back of the end zone could leap from the end zone, push off of the goal post on the way up and then bat the pass backward to a teammate. 

The current rule implies that an airborne player is "out of bounds" or "not out of bounds" but doesn't say anything about inbounds.   This is "not so logical" (bad pun intended).


Well, if you touch a goal post, then you wouldn't be airborne.  I think a case play would do the trick for that.

Quote
Prediction - the rule will remain unchanged but there will be an increased emphasis placed on making sure that jersey numbers are at least 8" and 10" on the front and back respectively.

Hahaha!  If we fixed this rule a long time ago, then we wouldn't have that ridiculous IP rule about going OOB and otherwise participating.

Offline RMR

  • *
  • Posts: 490
  • FAN REACTION: +10/-4
Re: Rules as seen on TV
« Reply #5 on: Yesterday at 10:10:38 AM »
Bring back the automatic 1st down on DPI.
"Just because you don't understand it, doesn't mean it's wrong."