September 10, 2010, 10:42:41 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:

 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
  Print  
Author Topic: NCAA Outlawing the Wedge  (Read 4987 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
bitols
***
Online Online

Posts: 35


View Profile
« Reply #50 on: May 05, 2010, 07:10:19 AM »

I suppose, but that doesn't seem like it's "forming a wedge".

I can believe it.  I scored 10 games (2 pre-season, 8 regular season), did a full review of 8 others (regular season), a cursory review of 2 more (pre-season) and watched at least parts of dozens of games and never saw it called.

I can't find on the 'net a list of each NFL penalty in 2009, but only for 2008...
http://www.cleveland.com/datacentral/index.ssf/2009/09/find_details_about_each_nfl_pe.html
and Illegal wedge isn't there...

Report to moderator   Logged
RickWts
***
Online Online

Posts: 539


View Profile
« Reply #51 on: May 05, 2010, 07:56:39 AM »

Don't know for sure about NFL, but NCAA it will be a USC.
Report to moderator   Logged
JasonTX
***
Online Online

Posts: 1070


View Profile
« Reply #52 on: May 05, 2010, 08:16:19 AM »

Don't know for sure about NFL, but NCAA it will be a USC.

That brings up another question.  We are being told that the foul is pinned on the third play to enter the wedge.  If so, does that mean if he does that twice he is disqualified?  This was talked about over the weekend and sometime in June it will be answered. 
Report to moderator   Logged
Atlanta Blue
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 1185


View Profile
« Reply #53 on: May 05, 2010, 08:28:16 AM »

I can't find on the 'net a list of each NFL penalty in 2009, but only for 2008...
http://www.cleveland.com/datacentral/index.ssf/2009/09/find_details_about_each_nfl_pe.html
and Illegal wedge isn't there...



It wasn't a penalty in 2008.
Report to moderator   Logged
bitols
***
Online Online

Posts: 35


View Profile
« Reply #54 on: May 05, 2010, 08:40:58 AM »


that's why I'm asking a 2009 penalties calling list  Cool
Report to moderator   Logged
Diablo
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 1219


View Profile
« Reply #55 on: May 05, 2010, 09:36:08 AM »

That brings up another question.  We are being told that the foul is pinned on the third play to enter the wedge.  If so, does that mean if he does that twice he is disqualified?  This was talked about over the weekend and sometime in June it will be answered. 

Instead of "noncontact foul", perhaps "illegal formation" [S19] would be a more appropriate tag.
Report to moderator   Logged
ref6983
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 34


View Profile
« Reply #56 on: May 05, 2010, 10:30:33 AM »

This is an unsportsmanlike conduct (UNS) foul on the receiving team. No player is assigned the foul and no number is announced.
Report to moderator   Logged
Atlanta Blue
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 1185


View Profile
« Reply #57 on: May 05, 2010, 11:10:33 AM »

that's why I'm asking a 2009 penalties calling list  Cool

I have access to the 2009 penalties, unfortunately, on a team by team basis (and player by player), not for the league in total - (don't ask, it's a system flaw if you ask me).

I seached all teams, and there are no recorded "Illegal Wedge Blocks".  Now, I'm sure the reason for this is not that there were no wedge blocks, it's that our systems don't have a code for wedge blocks, and they were recorded as another penalty.

Report to moderator   Logged
jg-me
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 197



View Profile
« Reply #58 on: May 05, 2010, 01:37:53 PM »

  Forming an illegal wedge is NOT an unsportsmanlike foul even though the signal is the same. Signal 27 is used for USC and also for certain other 15 yard fouls that are generically referred to as noncontact fouls. Examples are elevating a teammate in an attempt to block a kick, stepping on a teammate to gain leverage - basically all 9-3-5 fouls. These fouls are noncontact in the sense that they do not involve contact between opponents but they are in no way included as unsportsmanlke acts. While illegal, they also do not intefere with the orderly administration of the game and thus, when committed, they do not count toward the disqualification of any player. The placing of the wedge foul in rule 6 and not rule 9-2 is further evidence the foul is not intended to be considered USC.
Report to moderator   Logged
ref6983
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 34


View Profile
« Reply #59 on: May 05, 2010, 03:00:40 PM »

  Forming an illegal wedge is NOT an unsportsmanlike foul even though the signal is the same. Signal 27 is used for USC and also for certain other 15 yard fouls that are generically referred to as noncontact fouls. Examples are elevating a teammate in an attempt to block a kick, stepping on a teammate to gain leverage - basically all 9-3-5 fouls. These fouls are noncontact in the sense that they do not involve contact between opponents but they are in no way included as unsportsmanlke acts. While illegal, they also do not intefere with the orderly administration of the game and thus, when committed, they do not count toward the disqualification of any player. The placing of the wedge foul in rule 6 and not rule 9-2 is further evidence the foul is not intended to be considered USC.

The previous posts were addressing the NFL experience with the wedge and it was indeed considered an unsportsmanlike conduct foul and coded under "UNS", in spite of the fact it appeared in rule 6.  It remains to be seen if a new code will be created for an illegal wedge in NCAA games, but certainly the foul will not be assessed to the individual player.
Report to moderator   Logged
JasonTX
***
Online Online

Posts: 1070


View Profile
« Reply #60 on: May 05, 2010, 04:37:03 PM »

I would like to see them use the available signal #26 for this foul. 
Report to moderator   Logged
NVFOA_Ump
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 1677


High School (MA)


View Profile WWW
« Reply #61 on: May 06, 2010, 12:24:18 PM »

Does anyone have an understanding of why the rulesmakers have to continue to try to make the rules so confusing?   Why couldn't the new "wedge" definition simply describe and define the definition AND the foul as "3 or more players ....." and simply left out the "two or more ...." part and leave what amounts to a simple double team block alone?

That would have left a simple "a wedge formation" is illegal, and would have avoided the need to define a "legal wedge" vs. an "illegal wedge".
Report to moderator   Logged

It's easy to get the players, getting 'em to play together, that's the hard part. - Casey Stengel
JasonTX
***
Online Online

Posts: 1070


View Profile
« Reply #62 on: May 06, 2010, 01:09:05 PM »

One other question.  What is the definition of "onside kick formation" ?
Report to moderator   Logged
Hawkeye
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 288



View Profile
« Reply #63 on: May 12, 2010, 01:38:14 PM »

According to RR, the reason they defined the Wedge as two players, then outlawed three or more, is because there is a feeling on the Rules committee that in the coming years they may eliminate all wedges 2 or more players.  So they want you to start thinking of wedges as two or more players, then if they outlaw 2 or more, there will be no need to change our thinking of what a wedge is.
Report to moderator   Logged
Rulesman
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 985


Don't give up... Don't ever give up! - Jim Valvano


View Profile
« Reply #64 on: May 24, 2010, 08:03:12 PM »

Next we'll be trying to eliminate double-teaming...
Report to moderator   Logged

"Gentlemen, we are going to relentlessly chase perfection, knowing full well we will not catch it, because nothing is perfect. But we are going to relentlessly chase it, because in the process we will catch excellence. I am not remotely interested in just being good."
- Vince Lombardi
TxJim
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 307


View Profile
« Reply #65 on: May 28, 2010, 12:26:51 AM »

Illegal Wedge  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qfufqIoTUk
Report to moderator   Logged

Sportsmanship is contagious - Let's have an epidemic!
Osric Pureheart
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 224


1373937 or 308?


View Profile
« Reply #66 on: May 28, 2010, 08:17:06 PM »

Just out of interest; aside from the wedge issue, does anyone else see a block below the waist from B51?  He's on the inside left of the wedge.
Report to moderator   Logged
Welpe
***
Online Online

Posts: 782


ΙΧΘΥΣ


View Profile WWW
« Reply #67 on: May 28, 2010, 11:44:12 PM »

Just out of interest; aside from the wedge issue, does anyone else see a block below the waist from B51?  He's on the inside left of the wedge.

Good pickup.  Sure looks like it.

Great video, thanks TxJim!
Report to moderator   Logged
NVFOA_Ump
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 1677


High School (MA)


View Profile WWW
« Reply #68 on: May 29, 2010, 07:51:09 AM »

Just out of interest; aside from the wedge issue, does anyone else see a block below the waist from B51?  He's on the inside left of the wedge.

Don't think so.  Looks like the A player coming downfield goes low first toward the middle of the wedge (the wedge buster?) and B51 responds to keep him away from his knees.  Looks like 1st contact is shoulders, but it looks low since neither player is really standing straight up.  Not sure that I'd flag this one for BBW.
« Last Edit: May 29, 2010, 08:11:12 PM by NVFOA_Ump » Report to moderator   Logged

It's easy to get the players, getting 'em to play together, that's the hard part. - Casey Stengel
TXMike
***
Online Online

Posts: 4079



View Profile WWW
« Reply #69 on: May 29, 2010, 02:14:35 PM »

Wedge - yes
BBW - No
Report to moderator   Logged
ABoselli
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 170



View Profile
« Reply #70 on: May 30, 2010, 08:58:32 PM »

I have been going over films of my games from last season and I see a ton of (now) illegal wedges on kickoff returns.

I hope the coaches get the message on this earlier rather than later so it's not an issue.
Report to moderator   Logged
Atlanta Blue
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 1185


View Profile
« Reply #71 on: June 16, 2010, 01:27:43 PM »

I heard a rumour that the wedge ruling may be overturned and that there was a possibility of legal action - unable to find conformation with google.

Has anyone else heard this ?

Legal action?  Is the Kick Return Blockers Union threatening to sue?
Report to moderator   Logged
Aussie-Zebra
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 165



View Profile
« Reply #72 on: June 16, 2010, 02:13:04 PM »

My apologies - seems I was the victim of a rather bizarre practical joke.

How embarrassment.
« Last Edit: June 18, 2010, 04:39:07 AM by Aussie-Zebra » Report to moderator   Logged
RickWts
***
Online Online

Posts: 539


View Profile
« Reply #73 on: June 16, 2010, 04:52:53 PM »

Legal action?  Is the Kick Return Blockers Union threatening to sue?



 

Post of the Day!
Report to moderator   Logged
Morningrise
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 245


View Profile
« Reply #74 on: June 25, 2010, 10:07:31 AM »

This is a whole new kind of penalty enforcement, is it not? Penalty enforcement during kick plays has become very complicated.

The wedge rule says, the foul is treated as if it occurs during the kick and thus enforced from the dead ball spot (or B-20) if the ball belongs to Team B. But since when is that how any Team B fouls during free kicks are enforced? Since now, apparently.

First novelty: I can't think of any other foul where, even though the offending team does not have possession, the spot of the foul is still a possible enforcement spot.

Second novelty: For the last few years, penalties for the following fouls could be "tacked on" - i.e. enforced from the dead ball spot when the ball belonged to Team B.

1. All Team A fouls (including fouls at the snap), except KCI, during or before a free kick or punt, but not a FG attempt. But the offended team has the option of enforcing these penalties from the previous spot.

2. The Team A foul for illegally returning inbounds during or any time after a free kick, punt or FG attempt. But the offended team has the option of enforcing this penalty from the previous spot.

Now we add to that list:

3. The Team B foul for illegal wedge formation, during or any time after a free kick, provided the foul occurs beyond the dead ball spot. The offended team does not have the option of enforcing this penalty from the previous spot. It's either at the dead ball spot (or B-20) or the spot of the foul.

But if Team A ends up with the ball, all three of these are always enforced from the previous spot. So at least they have one thing in common.
Report to moderator   Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!