RefStripes.com
Football Officiating => NCAA Discussion => Topic started by: TXMike on December 08, 2013, 08:11:08 PM
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hc-aO6b1Ql0
-
The two guards? From the camera angle, neither block looks to be initially low.
-
The two guards? From the camera angle, neither block looks to be initially low.
Agree
-
Nothing..
-
I got nothing
-
High-high combination block. Legal.
-
I agree - no foul here. A good clip to show an example of why we need to watch the whole play starting with the initial contact. If we look a bit late here, looks like a chop. Both blocks start above the waist so we have legal blocks.
-
No Foul.
I do have a question for more experienced umpires. I had a similar block in a game this season - both OGs fired out onto NG and the C appeared to be trying to pull. IYO, is this correct execution or is somebody blocking the wrong guy?
In the situation I had, the C was actually tripped by his LG and wound up crashing down on the NG as well - helmet to knee. I never saw the scheme again in that game or any other. I felt it had to be a mistake which resulted in a rather ugly collision.
-
Its a mistake when a defender grabs a facemask but it is still a foul. Chop block is a safety call...you can't really judge on intent. Either it puts the defender at risk of a serious knee injury or it doesn't.
-
No foul. Lower block was at the waist, not below the knees. (NFHS 2-4 article 8)
-
Its a mistake when a defender grabs a facemask but it is still a foul. Chop block is a safety call...you can't really judge on intent. Either it puts the defender at risk of a serious knee injury or it doesn't.
Agreed. I had a foul. I'm simply asking about the blocking scheme.