RefStripes.com

Football Officiating => NCAA Discussion => Topic started by: TXMike on October 17, 2017, 08:59:59 PM

Title: Blocking Below the Waist
Post by: TXMike on October 17, 2017, 08:59:59 PM
You make the call

https://youtu.be/-LLGkd3RLh4
Title: Re: Blocking Below the Waist
Post by: mccormicw on October 17, 2017, 09:04:13 PM
IBW
Title: Re: Blocking Below the Waist
Post by: NVFOA_Ump on October 18, 2017, 04:40:48 AM
Agreed, IBW
Title: Re: Blocking Below the Waist
Post by: ChicagoZebra on October 18, 2017, 08:36:17 AM
Defender comes in from 3 o clock. Even though the actual contact was on the front, the approach angle makes this dangerous. Correct call.
Title: Re: Blocking Below the Waist
Post by: JDM on October 18, 2017, 08:42:44 AM
Looks 10-2 to me. Defender clearly saw the blocker.
Title: Re: Blocking Below the Waist
Post by: ChicagoZebra on October 18, 2017, 08:49:49 AM
Looks 10-2 to me. Defender clearly saw the blocker.

Check the CFO video from earlier this year about IBW. They make it clear the rule should include the blockers approach direction.
Title: Re: Blocking Below the Waist
Post by: NVFOA_Ump on October 18, 2017, 08:56:52 AM
Check the CFO video from earlier this year about IBW. They make it clear the rule should include the blockers approach direction.

I believe that this is real clear.  Both the blocker's approach and the actual contact must be within the 10-2 window.  Here the approach is clearly from the side.  This is an IBW.
Title: Re: Blocking Below the Waist
Post by: JDM on October 18, 2017, 09:20:51 AM
Still frame.

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: Blocking Below the Waist
Post by: NVFOA_Ump on October 18, 2017, 09:57:22 AM
Still even shows the foul clearly IMHO.  Blocker is on a north-south path while defender is on an east-west path.
Title: Re: Blocking Below the Waist
Post by: JDM on October 18, 2017, 10:14:15 AM
Still even shows the foul clearly IMHO.  Blocker is on a north south path while defender is on an east-west path.

Good point.
Title: Re: Blocking Below the Waist
Post by: wlemonnier on October 18, 2017, 12:36:33 PM
Totally agree with the views that this is an illegal low block.  Good call by the U.