RefStripes.com

Football Officiating => Texas Topics => Topic started by: HoustonUmp on June 11, 2019, 04:01:02 PM

Title: UIL Legislative Council results
Post by: HoustonUmp on June 11, 2019, 04:01:02 PM
This from the UIL June Legislative Council meeting.

THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON ATHLETICS
Will Continue to Monitor the Following Proposals
a. 4A and below home field advantage for football

THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON ATHLETICS
Denied, Rejected, or Took No Action on the Following Proposals
b. Two-hour character development for coaches
c. Add area round to the playoff golf structure
d. Require game administrators at all events
e. Eliminate the chop block in football
f. Allow seniors that transfer to participate in varsity athletics
g. Replace tackle football with 7 on 7
h. Instant replay at regional and state soccer
i. Publish all district and area track dates and locations
j. Allow 1st-5th golf finishers to advance to state
k. 4 regional finishers and top 9 to qualify for the state track meet
l. Change the baseball coaches in uniform policy

I am upset that we are still going to have to officiate TACKLE football!!   LOL
Title: Re: UIL Legislative Council results
Post by: TxSkyBolt on June 11, 2019, 04:06:06 PM
And that we chose not to eliminate Chop Blocks. If only there was a rule...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: UIL Legislative Council results
Post by: ElvisLives on June 11, 2019, 06:48:08 PM
Gee.  They rejected the idea of having character development?  I'm shocked.

And who needs a game administrator?

Title: Re: UIL Legislative Council results
Post by: Etref on June 11, 2019, 10:13:29 PM
Seldom have one that shows their face anyway, might as well make it official!
Title: Re: UIL Legislative Council results
Post by: Magician on June 12, 2019, 09:59:34 AM
And that we chose not to eliminate Chop Blocks. If only there was a rule...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Terms and definitions are so important. I know they likely mean low blocks when they say chop blocks, but it would be nice if they used the correct terminology.
Title: Re: UIL Legislative Council results
Post by: blindtxzebra on June 14, 2019, 06:53:46 AM
https://www.uiltexas.org/files/athletics/2019_UIL_Exceptions_to_NCAA_Football_Rules.pdf

10 sec runoff’s are official
Title: Re: UIL Legislative Council results
Post by: ElvisLives on June 14, 2019, 07:24:56 AM
10-second subtractions are easy.

Two tiers of Targeting - not so much.  Maybe not that difficult to officiate, but trying to get the spectators to understand why Johnny didn’t get DQd, but Billy did, will be next to impossible.  Even with a field mic, without giving a mini-rules clinic, they aren’t going to understand.  Billy’s mom is gonna be meeting us at the gate when we come off the field.  Heck, I doubt that many coaches will understand the UIL’s rule.  Even if they do, if we don’t DQ opponent Johnny, they will freak out when we DQ their Billy (and vice versa).

As with most rules, maybe it won’t be a big problem in real life.  But, on paper, it sure seems like a recipe for conflict.

Robert
Title: Re: UIL Legislative Council results
Post by: getnbetter on June 14, 2019, 12:06:20 PM
Regarding the targeting "changes", I'll be treating everyone the same and DQing everyoneflagged for targeting in an effort to eliminate any presumption of bias.