RefStripes.com

Football Officiating => NCAA Discussion => Topic started by: TXMike on March 07, 2013, 06:37:39 PM

Title: PROP Approves Everything (Almost)
Post by: TXMike on March 07, 2013, 06:37:39 PM
They gave all the changes we heard about the OK, except for requiring uniforms contrast with the field surface color.  Boise State lives for another year!!

http://www.ncaa.org/wps/wcm/connect//public/ncaa/resources/latest+news/2013/march/playing+rules+panel+approves+more+stringent+penalty+in+football
Title: Re: PROP Approves Everything (Almost)
Post by: PSK on March 07, 2013, 07:52:01 PM
Plus they denied the rule to switch the chains to the other sideline for the first half.
Title: Re: PROP Approves Everything (Almost)
Post by: FLBJ on March 08, 2013, 11:08:19 AM
Quote from: PSK on March 07, 2013, 07:52:01 PM
Plus they denied the rule to switch the chains to the other sideline for the first half.

Did you mean they won't switch at all because I think that's that last rule change listed. No?
Title: Re: PROP Approves Everything (Almost)
Post by: Sonofanump on March 08, 2013, 12:58:51 PM
Quote from: FLBJ on March 08, 2013, 11:08:19 AM
Did you mean they won't switch at all because I think that's that last rule change listed. No?

The following changes were recommended by the Rules Committee but were not approved by PROP.
Title: Re: PROP Approves Everything (Almost)
Post by: JasonTX on March 09, 2013, 08:39:36 PM
Quote from: PSK on March 07, 2013, 07:52:01 PM
Plus they denied the rule to switch the chains to the other sideline for the first half.

I never understood why they put this in as a rule change proposal in the first place.  If they want to switch sides, why not make it a mechanics change so they could have skipped the rule change process.   ???
Title: Re: PROP Approves Everything (Almost)
Post by: ljudge on March 17, 2013, 08:23:31 AM
Quote from: JasonTX on March 09, 2013, 08:39:36 PM
I never understood why they put this in as a rule change proposal in the first place.  If they want to switch sides, why not make it a mechanics change so they could have skipped the rule change process.   ???

Because it's in the rule book - 1.2.7.