Author Topic: UNR?  (Read 13237 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline fencewire

  • *
  • Posts: 439
  • FAN REACTION: +20/-74
UNR?
« on: October 15, 2012, 10:23:42 AM »
you think?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_on7LQ6mkTA


Looks like an old Mortal Kombat finishing move...

maven

  • Guest
Re: UNR?
« Reply #1 on: October 15, 2012, 10:48:51 AM »
Ouch. WWE, or whatever it's called this week?

Offline copedaddy

  • *
  • Posts: 323
  • FAN REACTION: +7/-6
Re: UNR?
« Reply #2 on: October 15, 2012, 11:09:52 AM »
He elevated the hips over the head and the head and shoulders hit first, that is an instant pin and a win for the defense--freestyle rules of course. I would say judging by the back arch and the hip thrust this kid has some time on a mat.

Offline bossman72

  • *
  • Posts: 2374
  • FAN REACTION: +312/-29
Re: UNR?
« Reply #3 on: October 15, 2012, 12:44:08 PM »
Here is another "angle" of that play


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4eKbpjaboGc

Offline Etref

  • Administrator
  • ***
  • Posts: 2423
  • FAN REACTION: +88/-29
  • " I don't make the rules coach!"
Re: UNR?
« Reply #4 on: October 15, 2012, 01:40:52 PM »
Why not DQ? I would certainly think that to be flagrant..........................
" I don't make the rules coach!"

Diablo

  • Guest
Re: UNR?
« Reply #5 on: October 15, 2012, 03:08:03 PM »
Here is another "angle" of that play


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4eKbpjaboGc

Now, that's down right funny for more than one reason.   LOL

rickref

  • Guest
Re: UNR?
« Reply #6 on: October 15, 2012, 03:41:15 PM »
Someone watched a little WWE growing up.

Offline allen

  • *
  • Posts: 143
  • FAN REACTION: +6/-4
Re: UNR?
« Reply #7 on: October 15, 2012, 03:46:11 PM »
Looked like a perfect form German Suplex to me!

Wonder why no one's talking about the mugging he got two plays later?
« Last Edit: October 15, 2012, 03:49:00 PM by allen »

Offline TXMike

  • *
  • Posts: 8775
  • FAN REACTION: +229/-269
  • When you quit learning you quit living
Re: UNR?
« Reply #8 on: October 15, 2012, 03:57:24 PM »
At first I was surprised his coach did not pull him after that cheap shot.  But then it dawned on me, the coach likely knew what was gonna happen to him if he let him stay in so he kept him in there and let the opponents exact some retribution.

Offline James

  • *
  • Posts: 692
  • FAN REACTION: +7/-6
Re: UNR?
« Reply #9 on: October 16, 2012, 01:46:55 AM »
Which they did. 2 o-liners each of the next 2 plays going at him, and the knee to the back of the head on the last play was definitely uncalled for.

Offline TXMike

  • *
  • Posts: 8775
  • FAN REACTION: +229/-269
  • When you quit learning you quit living
Re: UNR?
« Reply #10 on: October 16, 2012, 07:08:54 AM »
Oh it WAS called for.  Shouldn't have been done but WAS called for.

From:
http://www.tuscaloosanews.com/article/20121016/NEWS/121019847

TUSCALOOSA | University of Alabama defensive end LaMichael Fanning has written letters of apology for a controversial tackle in the waning minutes of UA's win over Missouri on Saturday.


Fanning, who has played only sparingly this season, picked up Missouri running back

Russell Hansbrough and flipped him on his head, a move known as a suplex in professional wrestling. Officials flagged Fanning for a personal foul, but he was not ejected.

"I think this is a young player who's excited about getting into the game, makes a very, very poor decision and judgment on making that play," UA coach Nick Saban said. "It's something that we don't condone here. It's not how we want our players to play."

In the two plays subsequent to Fanning's tackle, the Missouri offensive line clearly took exception, throwing Fanning to the ground after the ball carrier had gone out of bounds on one play, and pulling his helmet off on another.

"He's an aggressive player, and when you're tackling a small guy like that you can do just about anything you want," safety Robert Lester said. "He took advantage of him."

The Southeastern Conference had no comment on the matter Monday, and it remains to be seen whether the SEC office will take action against Fanning. The SEC has suspended two players this season for illegal tackles, but both of those were for helmet-to-helmet contact, which would not apply to Fanning's situation.

"We are managing internally things for him to do to make better choices and decisions in the future," Saban added. "I talked to (Missouri coach) Gary (Pinkel) yesterday about it. He understands our position on it."

Fanning has made four tackles on the season. Early Monday, Fanning's Twitter feed had a picture of the tackle as an avatar photo, but the photo was changed later in the day.
« Last Edit: October 16, 2012, 08:26:48 AM by TXMike »

110

  • Guest
Re: UNR?
« Reply #11 on: October 16, 2012, 10:21:16 AM »
That's an instant trip to the showers.

Offline Welpe

  • *
  • Posts: 1860
  • FAN REACTION: +28/-11
Re: UNR?
« Reply #12 on: October 16, 2012, 02:52:33 PM »

TUSCALOOSA | University of Alabama defensive end LaMichael Fanning has written letters of apology for a controversial tackle in the waning minutes of UA's win over Missouri on Saturday.
...
Fanning has made four tackles on the season. Early Monday, Fanning's Twitter feed had a picture of the tackle as an avatar photo, but the photo was changed later in the day.

Guess he was only sorry he was caught.

Offline TXMike

  • *
  • Posts: 8775
  • FAN REACTION: +229/-269
  • When you quit learning you quit living
Re: UNR?
« Reply #13 on: October 16, 2012, 04:32:40 PM »
UPDATE
http://alabama.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=1423084
TUSCALOOSA | The Southeastern Conference will not suspend University of Alabama defensive end LaMichael Fanning for a controversial tackle in the final minutes of UA's 42-10 road win over Missouri Saturday, Tidesports.com has learned.

 
 
Fanning's tackle drew the ire of Mizzou fans.
Fanning, a redshirt freshman, flipped Missouri running back Russell Hansbrough over his back Saturday, resulting in both players landing on their heads.

On Tuesday, the SEC office issued the following statement on the matter:

"The NCAA Football playing rules call for mandatory conference review following specific fouls. The SEC has been diligent in reviewing plays that by rule involve the initiation of contact and targeting defenseless opponents to the head and neck area. The conference maintains constant communication with head coaches on matters of penalty violations during the season.? In the first instance discipline for violations involving non-NCAA-required automatic conference review are to be handled by the institution subject to the approval of the league office."

The play drew the ire of Missouri fans when the tackle was replayed on the Faurot Field video board, and Missouri's offensive line targeted Fanning for two plays thereafter. UA coach Nick Saban admonished Fanning for the play in his news conference Monday, saying that his concerns about Fanning would be "managed internally." Fanning has played only sparingly this season and has made four tackles on the year.

Saban indicated Fanning has written letters of apology to both Hansbrough and Missouri coach Gary Pinkel. Saban said he spoke to Pinkel about the incident on Sunday.

Offline InsideTheStripes

  • *
  • Posts: 272
  • FAN REACTION: +0/-5
Re: UNR?
« Reply #14 on: October 17, 2012, 01:02:12 AM »
He elevated the hips over the head and the head and shoulders hit first, that is an instant pin and a win for the defense--freestyle rules of course. I would say judging by the back arch and the hip thrust this kid has some time on a mat.

That was my first thought... five and a fall.

Offline allen

  • *
  • Posts: 143
  • FAN REACTION: +6/-4
Re: UNR?
« Reply #15 on: October 17, 2012, 04:30:50 PM »
Would have been a lot cooler if he went for the pin after.

(and another 15 yards)

Offline VALJ

  • *
  • Posts: 2466
  • FAN REACTION: +95/-15
Re: UNR?
« Reply #16 on: October 24, 2012, 01:42:58 PM »
It was an awesome demonstration of a textbook belly-to-back suplex, though.  Hope the wrestling coach was watching.

Offline psv

  • *
  • Posts: 279
  • FAN REACTION: +14/-14
Re: UNR?
« Reply #17 on: October 24, 2012, 04:49:36 PM »
Definitely good form.  Freestyle he would get 5 for the throw, but it didnt look like both shoulders hit, so i dont know if he would get the fall or not.  Collegiate, he would need to keep control and turn him for back points.  He would get 2 for the take-down though.

For Football purposes, he should probably not do that....
« Last Edit: October 24, 2012, 04:51:49 PM by psv »