Author Topic: Linfield/Hampden-Sydney punt return (D3)  (Read 23743 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline dvasques

  • *
  • Posts: 508
  • FAN REACTION: +13/-2
Re: Linfield/Hampden-Sydney punt return (D3)
« Reply #25 on: December 05, 2013, 08:15:43 AM »
well… who am I to question RR's judgement but there should be no denying that the first block has launching markers…

not saying it's a foul, but the blocker did launch

Offline fencewire

  • *
  • Posts: 439
  • FAN REACTION: +20/-74
Re: Linfield/Hampden-Sydney punt return (D3)
« Reply #26 on: December 05, 2013, 03:47:10 PM »
just because there is a launch doesn't mean that there is a foul.  It is a high risk indicator but it is not cause for a foul simply because a player launches.

Offline Joe Stack

  • *
  • Posts: 637
  • FAN REACTION: +33/-46
Re: Linfield/Hampden-Sydney punt return (D3)
« Reply #27 on: December 06, 2013, 08:20:07 PM »
The third block -- the one closest to the punting team's goal line -- looks close to targeting on film but might have been different on the field.