« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Eligibility  (Read 10591 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline HoustonRef

  • *
  • Posts: 175
  • FAN REACTION: +16/-207
  • I am HoustonRef 100% Never doubt me
Eligibility
« on: February 09, 2016, 08:02:37 PM »
Just curious of other TASO member opinions
Logged

Offline TXMike

  • *
  • Posts: 8775
  • FAN REACTION: +229/-269
  • When you quit learning you quit living
Re: Eligibility
« Reply #1 on: February 09, 2016, 08:14:32 PM »
I think it has to be more clearly defined.  I.e is it a chapter probation or a state probation.  Is the position an elected position or  is it appointed?  Is it something that many guys want or is it like most positions in a volunteer outfit, something you have to beg someone to do?  And is it being done in accordance with, or contrary to, bylaws and written policies ?
Logged

Offline HoustonRef

  • *
  • Posts: 175
  • FAN REACTION: +16/-207
  • I am HoustonRef 100% Never doubt me
Re: Eligibility
« Reply #2 on: February 09, 2016, 08:27:58 PM »
- chapter and state
- appointed
- does this really matter
- good standing, to me being on probation you are not in good standing.
« Last Edit: February 09, 2016, 08:30:46 PM by HoustonRef »
Logged

Offline HoustonRef

  • *
  • Posts: 175
  • FAN REACTION: +16/-207
  • I am HoustonRef 100% Never doubt me
Re: Eligibility
« Reply #3 on: February 10, 2016, 05:26:04 PM »
Will anyone who voted "yes" elaborate on why they think a member on probation should be able serve in a leadership role?

I voted no because to me if you are on probation, you are not in good standing, therefore should not be eligible.
Logged

Offline DallasLJ

  • *
  • Posts: 568
  • FAN REACTION: +16/-15
Re: Eligibility
« Reply #4 on: February 10, 2016, 06:18:10 PM »
Really depends on what you Chapter By-Laws say.  How they define good standing, how they define qualifications for the office.  In Dallas I do not believe you would continue to hold an office, but I would have to get back and re-read the By-Laws.
Logged

Offline Joe Stack

  • *
  • Posts: 637
  • FAN REACTION: +33/-46
Re: Eligibility
« Reply #5 on: February 12, 2016, 10:31:12 PM »
The other issues is the nature of the probation or suspension. What if someone is given a playoff suspension but is still eligible to work regular season games? Or they are given a varsity suspension, but still eligible to work sub-varsity? Does either of these situations affect good standing?

Also, if you are limiting their ability to serve, are you also in favor of limiting their ability to vote in elections?
Logged

Offline Coby

  • *
  • Posts: 283
  • FAN REACTION: +24/-72
Re: Eligibility
« Reply #6 on: February 18, 2016, 10:59:03 AM »
I have a bigger problem with life time members who have not worked a game in 3+ years being able to vote during any chapter election.
Logged

Offline DallasLJ

  • *
  • Posts: 568
  • FAN REACTION: +16/-15
Re: Eligibility
« Reply #7 on: February 18, 2016, 01:35:50 PM »
Quote from: Coby on February 18, 2016, 10:59:03 AM
I have a bigger problem with life time members who have not worked a game in 3+ years being able to vote during any chapter election.
  Also a By-Law issue, but I do not have a problem with this.  They helped build the chapter, devoted time and effort to the chapter.  Why shouldn't they still be able to vote --  just because they are off the field?
Logged

Offline HoustonRef

  • *
  • Posts: 175
  • FAN REACTION: +16/-207
  • I am HoustonRef 100% Never doubt me
Re: Eligibility
« Reply #8 on: February 18, 2016, 02:01:12 PM »
Quote from: Coby on February 18, 2016, 10:59:03 AM
I have a bigger problem with life time members who have not worked a game in 3+ years being able to vote during any chapter election.
lol

This has to be a joke right?
Logged

Offline HoustonRef

  • *
  • Posts: 175
  • FAN REACTION: +16/-207
  • I am HoustonRef 100% Never doubt me
Re: Eligibility
« Reply #9 on: February 26, 2016, 06:33:42 PM »
Bump
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »