Author Topic: Illegal Touching Question.  (Read 3659 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline BetweenTheLines

  • *
  • Posts: 186
  • FAN REACTION: +12/-3
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Illegal Touching Question.
« on: September 26, 2020, 08:28:38 PM »
Was watching SC vs TN and there was an illegal touching call on 4th down that was declined. In NFHS this would not make sense. Is there no loss of down in NCAA?

Offline Clear Lake ref

  • *
  • Posts: 237
  • FAN REACTION: +5/-2
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: Illegal Touching Question.
« Reply #1 on: September 26, 2020, 08:37:08 PM »
Correct.

Offline Legacy Zebra

  • *
  • Posts: 1035
  • FAN REACTION: +56/-11
Re: Illegal Touching Question.
« Reply #2 on: September 26, 2020, 08:59:28 PM »
Depends on what kind of illegal touching it was. If it was by an originally ineligible player, it would be a 5 yard penalty from the previous spot, so it would make sense to decline it. If it was by an originally eligible player who went out of bounds, it would be loss of down at the previous spot, so it would not make sense to decline the penalty.

Offline ElvisLives

  • *
  • Posts: 4626
  • FAN REACTION: +188/-188
  • The rules are there if you need them.
Re: Illegal Touching Question.
« Reply #3 on: September 26, 2020, 09:00:40 PM »
Was watching SC vs TN and there was an illegal touching call on 4th down that was declined. In NFHS this would not make sense. Is there no loss of down in NCAA?

Which type of illegal touching?
Illegal touching by an originally ineligible player is a 5-yard penalty, and repeat the down. Illegal touching by an originally eligible player who becomes ineligible during the down is loss of down at the previous spot.

Offline BetweenTheLines

  • *
  • Posts: 186
  • FAN REACTION: +12/-3
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: Illegal Touching Question.
« Reply #4 on: September 27, 2020, 07:56:26 AM »
It was of the no loss of down variety. Thanks for the info!