Author Topic: Bama-TAMU Game Question  (Read 5581 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

secfan

  • Guest
Bama-TAMU Game Question
« on: November 13, 2012, 08:43:40 AM »
Curious about the play before TAMU'as first touchdonw in the Bama/TAMU game last weekend.  I hope someone on this site can provide video as I do not have access, but i can describe the play.  Happened at around the 11:22 mark in the 1Q as TAMU was driving to their first TD.

Official stood over the ball as Alabama substituted (TAMU ball on the Bama 5 yard line).  TAMU was at the line, with their linemen all standing, with the exception of the center, who was over the ball.  Manziel and 2  backs in the backfield.  As the official moved off the ball, Bama players took a few secs to line themselves up and the TAMU line continued to stand and point around -- they never went into a stance.  Center snapped the ball as that was going on, with no one moving.  Manziel just held the ball against his leg for a second, then took a step to his right and handed the ball to the running back, who went left.  About the same time, the line finally moved and the play went for about 2 or 3 yards. 

My question is how was that a legal play and not some sort of movement call on the part of A&M since no one was set for any time prior to the play (again, except for the center)?  No one said much about the play but it just seemed really odd to me since the linemen never went into a stance and were continuing to move the whole time.  Anyone know the play I am referring to?  Appreciate the help from the experts.   

Offline Birddog

  • *
  • Posts: 211
  • FAN REACTION: +2/-2
Re: Bama-TAMU Game Question
« Reply #1 on: November 13, 2012, 09:40:59 AM »
The linemen were set, there was no shift.  The U stepped back then the ball was snapped.  Looked good to me.

One play I do have a question about was also in the first quarter.  A&M lined up with their tackles split wide to each side as a blocker for a WR.  They were called for an illegal formation, R said one of wide tackles wasn't on the line.  Problem is they were closer to the line than the WR that was split wide and also lined up on the line.  On the play Alabama was also called for a substitution which should of been killed before the snap. Crew looked a little confused and the pace of the offense could of contributed to that.

Offline TXMike

  • *
  • Posts: 8775
  • FAN REACTION: +229/-269
  • When you quit learning you quit living
Re: Bama-TAMU Game Question
« Reply #2 on: November 14, 2012, 07:16:27 PM »

El Macman

  • Guest
Re: Bama-TAMU Game Question
« Reply #3 on: November 14, 2012, 08:13:38 PM »
On the play Alabama was also called for a substitution which should of been killed before the snap.

Why?

Offline TXMike

  • *
  • Posts: 8775
  • FAN REACTION: +229/-269
  • When you quit learning you quit living
Re: Bama-TAMU Game Question
« Reply #4 on: November 14, 2012, 08:33:55 PM »
Don'tknow about before the snap but seems like should have been shut down as soon as was snapped

https://cfo.arbitersports.com/Groups/104777/Library/files/ElevenPlusBCHelmet.pdf

Offline NVFOA_Ump

  • *
  • Posts: 4200
  • FAN REACTION: +107/-351
  • High School (MA & RI)
    • Massachusetts Independent Football Officials Association
Re: Bama-TAMU Game Question
« Reply #5 on: November 15, 2012, 05:34:47 AM »
The linemen were set, .......

But doesn't 7-1-2 come into play here: "Each of the following is a false start by Team A if it occurs prior to the snap after the ball is ready for play and all players are in scrimmage formation .....
    3. A restricted lineman (Rule 2-27-4) moving his hand(s) ......" ?
It's easy to get the players, getting 'em to play together, that's the hard part. - Casey Stengel

Offline Birddog

  • *
  • Posts: 211
  • FAN REACTION: +2/-2
Re: Bama-TAMU Game Question
« Reply #6 on: November 15, 2012, 09:09:24 AM »
Don'tknow about before the snap but seems like should have been shut down as soon as was snapped

Agree Mike, I should of said shut down at the snap.