Author Topic: Block Below the Waist - Illegal 2012 - Legal 2013 ?  (Read 8499 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline TXMike

  • *
  • Posts: 8775
  • FAN REACTION: +229/-269
  • When you quit learning you quit living
Block Below the Waist - Illegal 2012 - Legal 2013 ?
« on: June 23, 2013, 11:38:09 AM »
Example of a block that was illegal last year but legal this year?

http://youtu.be/GLr4m--h5GM

Offline TxSkyBolt

  • *
  • Posts: 2007
  • FAN REACTION: +45/-46
Re: Block Below the Waist - Illegal 2012 - Legal 2013 ?
« Reply #1 on: June 23, 2013, 03:31:24 PM »
Yes

Offline TXMike

  • *
  • Posts: 8775
  • FAN REACTION: +229/-269
  • When you quit learning you quit living
Re: Block Below the Waist - Illegal 2012 - Legal 2013 ?
« Reply #2 on: June 25, 2013, 10:49:07 AM »
Thankfully the change published today has fixed the glitch.  Now those players restricted at the snap cannot block low towards the orig position of the ball.

rickref

  • Guest
Re: Block Below the Waist - Illegal 2012 - Legal 2013 ?
« Reply #3 on: June 25, 2013, 11:38:42 AM »
Can you post that update?

Offline TXMike

  • *
  • Posts: 8775
  • FAN REACTION: +229/-269
  • When you quit learning you quit living
Re: Block Below the Waist - Illegal 2012 - Legal 2013 ?
« Reply #4 on: June 25, 2013, 11:59:44 AM »
​This announcement is being issued as a clarification of Rule 9-1-6, Blocking Below the Waist.  The rule as originally constructed inadvertently legalized the “crackback block” which has long been prohibited as a matter of player safety.  This clarification has been approved by the NCAA Football Rules Committee and ratified by the Playing Rules Oversight Panel.
​Here is the rule in its entirety, with the new language highlighted in red.
 
Blocking Below The Waist (9-1-6)
a.  Team A prior to a change of team possession:
Consider a low-blocking zone seven yards on each side of the snapper extending five yards beyond the neutral zone and back to Team A’s end line (Rule 2-3-7 and Appendix D).
1. The following Team A players may legally block below the waist inside this zone until the ball has left the zone: (a) players on the line of scrimmage completely within this zone at the snap and (b) stationary backs who at the snap are at least partially inside the tackle box and at least partially inside the frame of the body of the second lineman from the snapper.
 
2. Players not covered in paragraph 1 (above) while the ball is still in the zone, and all players after the ball has left the zone, are allowed to block below the waist only if the force of the initial contact is from the front, but they may not block below the waist if the force of the initial contact is from the side or back.  “From the front” is understood to mean within the clock-face region between “10 o’clock and 2 o’clock” forward of the player being blocked.
 
3. Once the ball has left the zone a player may not block below the waist toward his own end line. 
 
4.  Players not covered in paragraph 1 (above) may not block below the waist toward the original position of the ball at the snap.
 
b. Team B prior to a change of team possession:
1. Other than in paragraphs 2 and 3 (below), players of Team B may block below the waist only within the area defined by lines parallel to the goal line five yards beyond and behind the neutral zone extended to the sidelines.  Blocking below the waist by players of Team B outside this area is illegal except against the ball carrier.
 
2. Players of Team B may not block below the waist against an opponent who is in position to receive a backward pass.
 
3. Players of Team B may not block below the waist against an eligible Team A pass receiver beyond the neutral zone unless attempting to get to the ball or ball carrier.  This prohibition ends when a legal forward pass is no longer possible by rule.
 
c. Kicks
During a down in which there is a free kick or a scrimmage kick, blocking below the waist by any player is illegal except against a ball carrier.
 
d. After change of team possession
After any change of team possession, blocking below the waist by any player is illegal except against a ball carrier.
 
 
Modification of Approved Rulings
Please note these changes to Approved Rulings 9-1-6-IV and -VII for consistency with the new language in Rule 9-1-6.
 
A.R. 9-1-6-IV
Back A31, a flanker positioned to the left side of a formation, runs a deep reverse to the right side after receiving the ball from a teammate. End A82 at the snap is positioned 10 yards from the snapper on the right side of the formation. As A31 turns the corner A82 blocks B62 toward the left sideline. The block by A82 is below the waist and generally at the front but outside the “10 o’clock to 2 o’clock” width. The block occurs behind or one yard beyond the neutral zone. RULING: Illegal block below the waist because it is too much to the opponent’s side and because it is directed toward the original position of the ball. 15-yard penalty. Enforce at the previous spot if the foul occurs behind the neutral zone.
 
A.R. 9-1-6-VII
Back A22 is stationary or in motion inside the tackle box at the snap. As the play develops he leads a sweep to the right side and blocks below the waist against a linebacker after the ball carrier has left the low-blocking zone. RULING: Legal block as long as the force of the initial contact is at the front within the “10-to-2 o’clock” region and is not toward Team A’s end line. If A22 is in motion at the snap, his block is illegal if it is toward the original position of the ball.
 
 
Rogers Redding
National Coordinator of Football Officials
Secretary-Rules Editor
June 25, 2013
3

younggun

  • Guest
Re: Block Below the Waist - Illegal 2012 - Legal 2013 ?
« Reply #5 on: June 25, 2013, 12:21:49 PM »
Do you have a PDF of this or something?

Offline Rulesman

  • Past Keeper of the Keys
  • Refstripes Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 3839
  • FAN REACTION: +65535/-2
  • Live like tomorrow never comes.
Re: Block Below the Waist - Illegal 2012 - Legal 2013 ?
« Reply #6 on: June 25, 2013, 02:37:19 PM »
Do you have a PDF of this or something?
Copy and paste it into a Word doc.
"Gentlemen, we are going to relentlessly chase perfection, knowing full well we will not catch it, because nothing is perfect. But we are going to relentlessly chase it, because in the process we will catch excellence. I am not remotely interested in just being good."
- Vince Lombardi

Offline justaLJ

  • *
  • Posts: 69
  • FAN REACTION: +2/-0
Re: Block Below the Waist - Illegal 2012 - Legal 2013 ?
« Reply #7 on: June 25, 2013, 02:40:57 PM »
The note mentions changes in red, so the original PDF or Word doc may be helpful in that regard.

In my quick scan, the only new language that stuck out was the addition of 9-1-6-a-4

Offline Ump62

  • *
  • Posts: 131
  • FAN REACTION: +3/-0
Re: Block Below the Waist - Illegal 2012 - Legal 2013 ?
« Reply #8 on: June 25, 2013, 05:12:02 PM »
PDF attached...

[attachment deleted by admin]

younggun

  • Guest
Re: Block Below the Waist - Illegal 2012 - Legal 2013 ?
« Reply #9 on: June 25, 2013, 06:20:21 PM »
Copy and paste it into a Word doc.

Just got the email... from RR.

Offline TXMike

  • *
  • Posts: 8775
  • FAN REACTION: +229/-269
  • When you quit learning you quit living
Re: Block Below the Waist - Illegal 2012 - Legal 2013 ?
« Reply #10 on: June 25, 2013, 06:28:26 PM »
Seems pretty straightforward but there is still an area I am not clear on. 

With regard to the "players in para 1" (also known as the unrestricted blockers"....are they permitted to block low (from front and side) towards the original position of the ball at the snap, if:
 #1 - the ball is still in the zone, or
 # 2 - the ball is outside the zone, or
 # 3 - the block is outside the zone?

I would assume that #1 is Yes.  #2  and 3 I think are also yes but I am not sure.   The way the 2d AR reads, if the blocker was unrestricted at the snap, then he can block low FROM THE FRONT, even back in towards the orig position of the ball at the snap,  throughout the down. When the change first came out we were told one of the greatest benefits of the change was that we no longer had to consider where the blocker came from when judging on the legality of a block that developed somewhat late into the play.    Seems we now WILL have to consider that if the block is back in towards the original position of the ball.
« Last Edit: June 25, 2013, 06:45:27 PM by TXMike »