Bidding for services is the wrong way to go and creates unnecessary schisms in the officiating ranks.
Already exists. Schools go back and forth between Dallas and Fort Worth chapters. Both seek out schools during the time TASO allows the chapters to do such a thing. I'm sure other chapters have similar issues. We work it out.
Who gets to decide who is a better official that the schools are willing to pay more for?
This isn't an issue. The chapter decides what it will or will not work the games (SV or V) for, and the school district agrees or doesn't agree. Everyone here is very familiar with this system because they use it in every other endeavor in their life from work to leisure.
Doesn't such a system just drive the "lesser viewed" official from the game making the shortage worse.
Explain how a market based system would do this where a fixed price system, where the prices don't rise much, doesn't.
How do you separate out varsity from subvarsity coverage.
That's between the district and the chapter. Different chapters HAVE covered school's varsity and subvarsity schedules simultaneously.
Nobody does this (or should) as their job and primary source of income -- so let's not pretend like we are like every other vendor offering services to schools.
This has nothing to do with anything. Cops work security in a part time fashion. Other vendors sell their products or services to more than just schools. Only companies like educational service companies (or consultants) and school district employees derive all or most of their income from schools. Everyone else -- and its a significant number (office supplies, contractors, electronics equipment manufacturers and sellers, etc.) -- have other sources of business or income. But for the life of me, I can't figure out what this has to do with the discussion. Few people spend significants amounts of money and time getting prepared to do their part time job (for lack of a better way of putting it). You buy your uniform and gear, pay your dues, pay for training, spend a lot of time traveling to and from games, in meetings, etc. Name one other service that involves this much time, money and effort.
If the price that the UIL / schools are willing to pay dips too low to attract enough officials to continue, then the UIL will have a choice to make -- (1) increase pay to increase the officiating pool, or (2) cut subvarsity programs to meet the available officiating pool.
Specifically when was the last time either one of these happened? While UIL did allow the travel allowance to increase before last year, 5-7 years ago, I was making $45 for JV games in one district, and 3-4 years ago, was making $50 for JV games in another district. Both were likely due to athletic secretaries paying based on historical pay rates (due to agreements with the chapter) rather than 1204. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the 30 (or 35) through 45 dollar pay rate for subvarsity is the same as it was as far back as 2007 and possibly earlier than that. Again, I don't recall because back then, school districts hadn't been clamped down on by UIL to pay the 1204 rate. Some did and some didn't. I know for a fact that school districts themselves didn't complain about paying agreed to rates with the chapter.
I can't for the life of me figure why some of you guys are willing to just sit by and let UIL tell us our business simply because they represent or set rules for our clients. Please name one other organization that does that.