Author Topic: Asking NFHS, but asking you first.....  (Read 858 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ralph Damren

  • *
  • Posts: 4964
  • FAN REACTION: +872/-28
  • SEE IT-THINK IT-CALL IT
Asking NFHS, but asking you first.....
« on: September 14, 2025, 04:16:17 PM »
This happened in a game yhis weekend..../..

(1) R1 returns kickoff from his 20;

(2) At 50, R1 is grabbed by facemask and helmet goes a' flying;  ^flag (15 FM)

(3) no whistles  :o :o :o :o :o and hatless runner goes to K's 20 where tackled  ^flag (IP)

(4) After discussion,  ^talk ^talk yEs: ref rules penalties offset and to replay the kickoff......

WHAT SAY YOU  ??? ???.
« Last Edit: September 14, 2025, 04:20:27 PM by Ralph Damren »

Offline ncwingman

  • *
  • Posts: 1410
  • FAN REACTION: +77/-15
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: Asking NFHS, but asking you first.....
« Reply #1 on: September 14, 2025, 09:13:06 PM »
Okay -- first issue, there were two fouls on K and they... *offset them*?  :!#

Offline TSHunt

  • *
  • Posts: 21
  • FAN REACTION: +5/-0
  • Back Judge / Referee
Re: Asking NFHS, but asking you first.....
« Reply #2 on: September 14, 2025, 09:19:46 PM »
That ball is dead when that runner's helmet came off, even though it wasn't stopped immediately.

Waive the IP, inform all relevant parties the ball became dead at 50 when the returner's helmet came off.

Enforce the Facemask to the 35 and thank your lucky stars that kid without his lid didn't get seriously injured. 
In memory of everyone's favorite 30-yard penalty (19XX-2023)

Offline SCline

  • *
  • Posts: 136
  • FAN REACTION: +8/-1
Re: Asking NFHS, but asking you first.....
« Reply #3 on: September 14, 2025, 11:22:08 PM »
Can’t have IP because the down was over when the helmet came off the runner.

Enforce the FM from the 50, R 1/10 at K35.

Offline GA Umpire

  • Refstripes Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 382
  • FAN REACTION: +32/-3
Re: Asking NFHS, but asking you first.....
« Reply #4 on: September 15, 2025, 03:25:02 AM »
That ball is dead when that runner's helmet came off, even though it wasn't stopped immediately.

Waive the IP, inform all relevant parties the ball became dead at 50 when the returner's helmet came off.

Enforce the Facemask to the 35 and thank your lucky stars that kid without his lid didn't get seriously injured.

 aWaRd yEs: aWaRd yEs: aWaRd yEs: aWaRd

7-man crew

Offline ncwingman

  • *
  • Posts: 1410
  • FAN REACTION: +77/-15
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: Asking NFHS, but asking you first.....
« Reply #5 on: September 15, 2025, 09:29:43 AM »
Second comment -- the dead ball shenanigans shouldn't be ignored. A player of K initiated contact with the helmet-less runner. This isn't Illegal Participation, but it IS Illegal Personal Contact (9-4-3i .. could be slightly off on the rule, my closest rule book at the moment is a few years old, but I don't think that's changed). That is a severe safety issue and shouldn't be waived off.

One could argue the helmet-less runner also committed a foul by continuing to run down the field, but that would be delay of game. I don't think you can charge him with IP, since the ball became dead once his helmet came off. If you wanted to erroneously call it IP, then the dead ball yardage cancels out and you just enforce the facemask from the 50, but we're kind of inventing rules at this point.

Offline NVFOA_Ump

  • *
  • Posts: 4121
  • FAN REACTION: +107/-312
  • High School (MA & RI)
    • Massachusetts Independent Football Officials Association
Re: Asking NFHS, but asking you first.....
« Reply #6 on: September 15, 2025, 10:59:56 AM »
Second comment -- the dead ball shenanigans shouldn't be ignored. A player of K initiated contact with the helmet-less runner. This isn't Illegal Participation, but it IS Illegal Personal Contact (9-4-3i .. could be slightly off on the rule, my closest rule book at the moment is a few years old, but I don't think that's changed). That is a severe safety issue and shouldn't be waived off.

One could argue the helmet-less runner also committed a foul by continuing to run down the field, but that would be delay of game. I don't think you can charge him with IP, since the ball became dead once his helmet came off. If you wanted to erroneously call it IP, then the dead ball yardage cancels out and you just enforce the facemask from the 50, but we're kind of inventing rules at this point.
No way that I'm calling a penalty on either of the 2 "fouls" after the crew failed to whistle the play dead when the runner's helmet was initially ripped off.  IMHO that's on us 100% of the time.
It's easy to get the players, getting 'em to play together, that's the hard part. - Casey Stengel

Offline Fatso

  • *
  • Posts: 305
  • FAN REACTION: +10/-20
  • Hey ref, call it both ways.......
Re: Asking NFHS, but asking you first.....
« Reply #7 on: September 15, 2025, 01:31:44 PM »
Okay -- first issue, there were two fouls on K and they... *offset them*?  :!#
One on K (facemask) and one on R (illegal participation playing without a helmet).  So this appears to be a clean hands situation.  Both fouls are after change of possession.  I believe R can decline the facemask penalty but will be penalized for their IP from the 50.  They can play 1/10 from own 35 or accept the facemask and replay down for offsetting penalties.


Quote
One could argue the helmet-less runner also committed a foul by continuing to run down the field, but that would be delay of game. I don't think you can charge him with IP, since the ball became dead once his helmet came off. If you wanted to erroneously call it IP, then the dead ball yardage cancels out and you just enforce the facemask from the 50, but we're kind of inventing rules at this point.
Continuing to play without a helmet is IP not DOG, nothing erroneous about it.  It's a safety foul.
« Last Edit: September 15, 2025, 01:38:21 PM by Fatso »

Offline ncwingman

  • *
  • Posts: 1410
  • FAN REACTION: +77/-15
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: Asking NFHS, but asking you first.....
« Reply #8 on: September 15, 2025, 01:45:37 PM »
One on K (facemask) and one on R (illegal participation playing without a helmet).  So this appears to be a clean hands situation.  Both fouls are after change of possession.  I believe R can decline the facemask penalty but will be penalized for their IP from the 50.  They can play 1/10 from own 35 or accept the facemask and replay down for offsetting penalties.

 Continuing to play without a helmet is IP not DOG, nothing erroneous about it.  It's a safety foul.

The ball is dead once the runner loses his helmet. A runner without a helmet cannot illegally participate - but it is illegal for any other player to engage with somebody who has lost a helmet. If the ball is dead and the runner continues to run down the field, that's delay of game.

I'm assuming the foul in line 3 is not on the runner for running away from everybody else and trying not to engage in contact, but on the K player who saw a helmet-less player and decided to tackle him.

The take home message here is that the crew screwed up in several ways.

Offline Steely Dan

  • *
  • Posts: 11
  • FAN REACTION: +4/-0
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: Asking NFHS, but asking you first.....
« Reply #9 on: September 15, 2025, 01:49:38 PM »
The ball is dead once the runner loses his helmet. A runner without a helmet cannot illegally participate - but it is illegal for any other player to engage with somebody who has lost a helmet. If the ball is dead and the runner continues to run down the field, that's delay of game.

In NFHS, it's a 15 yd penalty "Participating without a helmet"  ILP/PWH.  Rule is 9-6-4g.
« Last Edit: September 15, 2025, 01:51:44 PM by Steely Dan »

Offline NVFOA_Ump

  • *
  • Posts: 4121
  • FAN REACTION: +107/-312
  • High School (MA & RI)
    • Massachusetts Independent Football Officials Association
Re: Asking NFHS, but asking you first.....
« Reply #10 on: September 15, 2025, 01:52:39 PM »
In NFHS, it's a 15 yd penalty "Participating without a helmet"  ILP/PWH.
Except at the point the runner loses his helmet the play is OVER and the ball is DEAD.  He by rule cannot and is not "participating" at that point.  How can you have a live ball fouls after the play has ended by rule??? ???
It's easy to get the players, getting 'em to play together, that's the hard part. - Casey Stengel

Offline Steely Dan

  • *
  • Posts: 11
  • FAN REACTION: +4/-0
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: Asking NFHS, but asking you first.....
« Reply #11 on: September 15, 2025, 01:57:54 PM »
Except at the point the runner loses his helmet the play is OVER and the ball is DEAD.  He by rule cannot and is not "participating" at that point.  How can you have a live ball fouls after the play has ended by rule??? ???
Makes sense, sorry.

Offline Ralph Damren

  • *
  • Posts: 4964
  • FAN REACTION: +872/-28
  • SEE IT-THINK IT-CALL IT
Re: Asking NFHS, but asking you first.....
« Reply #12 on: September 15, 2025, 03:12:56 PM »
Word from NFHS......

(1) The play should have been blown dead when the runner's helmet came off (4-2-2K).

(2) Where the play wasn't blown dead, the ball remained alive.  pi1eOn

(3) The hatless runner was guilty of playing without a helmet (9-6-4g).   ^flag

(4) The hatless runner was then tackled by an opponent. (9-4-3L)  ^flag

(5) R got the ball with clean hands and could decline K's fouls and take the ball at their 35 after IP enforcement. OR replay the free kick. The game officials confurred and did a "do-over" (10-2-1). We  z^ refer to it as replaying the down/kick.  8] The hatless runner would not have to sit out a play as he lost his helmet via an illegal act. ^flag

EVEN A BROKEN CLOCK IS RIGHT TWICE A DAY.  tiphat:


Online Snapper

  • *
  • Posts: 171
  • FAN REACTION: +16/-2
Re: Asking NFHS, but asking you first.....
« Reply #13 on: September 15, 2025, 07:26:13 PM »
EVEN A BROKEN CLOCK IS RIGHT TWICE A DAY.  tiphat:


So, I guess that means that a stopped clock is about 4 times more accurate than the NFHS Editorial Committee???  :laugh: :laugh:

Offline SCline

  • *
  • Posts: 136
  • FAN REACTION: +8/-1
Re: Asking NFHS, but asking you first.....
« Reply #14 on: September 15, 2025, 11:33:53 PM »
Quote
(2) Where the play wasn't blown dead, the ball remained alive.

Uhm, what?

Did the folks you talked to forget about football fundamental 3-1?
« Last Edit: September 15, 2025, 11:40:59 PM by SCline »

Offline refjeff

  • *
  • Posts: 589
  • FAN REACTION: +22/-31
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: Asking NFHS, but asking you first.....
« Reply #15 on: September 17, 2025, 08:02:42 PM »


4-2-2-k.  The ball becomes dead and the down is ended: When the helmet comes completely off the runner. 

Does not say "but only if the covering official(s) blow their whistle."

Two players will be penalized because they didn't know the rules any better than the game officials?  I'm not doing that. 

Offline NVFOA_Ump

  • *
  • Posts: 4121
  • FAN REACTION: +107/-312
  • High School (MA & RI)
    • Massachusetts Independent Football Officials Association
Re: Asking NFHS, but asking you first.....
« Reply #16 on: September 18, 2025, 06:09:16 AM »

4-2-2-k.  The ball becomes dead and the down is ended: When the helmet comes completely off the runner. 

Does not say "but only if the covering official(s) blow their whistle."

Two players will be penalized because they didn't know the rules any better than the game officials?  I'm not doing that.
:thumbup  - Agreed, We simply cannot penalize teams because we made an obvious error in enforcing the clear rule here.  Our bad, move on.
It's easy to get the players, getting 'em to play together, that's the hard part. - Casey Stengel

Offline DJW201

  • *
  • Posts: 19
  • FAN REACTION: +1/-0
Re: Asking NFHS, but asking you first.....
« Reply #17 on: September 19, 2025, 12:30:01 PM »
The Federation answer is nonsensical.

After the ball becomes dead by rule, any foul should be ignored, except a personal foul or unsportsmanlike conduct, which still must be enforced during a dead ball period.  If the ball is already dead, a whistle does not kill the play.

What about a long field goal attempt that is short and the crew allows the defensive team returner to bring the ball out of the end zone?  If there is a holding foul on the return, what do you do with it?

Unfortunately, mistakes have consequences.