Author Topic: RR Notes re Mechanics Associated with Uns Conduct  (Read 5198 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TXMike

  • *
  • Posts: 8773
  • FAN REACTION: +229/-269
  • When you quit learning you quit living
RR Notes re Mechanics Associated with Uns Conduct
« on: May 03, 2011, 12:45:32 PM »
About time!!!!  Never understood why we were expected to save them from themselves.

COLLEGE FOOTBALL OFFICIATING, LLC

MECHANICS: Preventive Officiating and Unsportsmanlike Conduct
The guidelines for officiating unsportsmanlike conduct fouls by players are clear and have been in place for a number of years. Players, coaches, and officials should have no question when a foul has occurred. Spontaneous reactions to a great play are allowed as long as the specific act does not become prolonged nor violate the restrictions of Rule 9-2-1-a-2.
In the past, officials have attempted to prevent unsportsmanlike acts by rushing toward the player who has scored, intercepted a pass, sacked the quarterback, etc. There are several issues that arise in an official’s zeal to prevent a foul. The official:
 appears over-officious by "attacking" a player who has done nothing wrong;
 narrows his field of vision making it difficult to discern the exact nature of the player's actions; and
 is put in harm's way when he enters an area where multiple players are excitedly celebrating a good play by a teammate.
Effective with the 2011 season, officials should not rush toward any player or players to prevent potential celebratory, unsportsmanlike acts. They should maintain a presence at a reasonable distance and observe the actions of the players. If the actions border on unsportsmanlike conduct, no foul is to be called and that information should be relayed to the head coach. If a foul is committed, a flag should be thrown without emotion or further action toward the player.
Note: These mechanics are for situations when the actions involve the players of only one team. If there is a threat of a foul involving opponents, officials should, as always, intervene to avoid further escalation, such as taunting or unnecessary roughness fouls.
Thanks to Coordinators Terry McAulay (Big East), Ken Rivera (Mountain West) and Steve Shaw (Southeastern) for developing these guidelines.

El Macman

  • Guest
Re: RR Notes re Mechanics Associated with Uns Conduct
« Reply #1 on: May 03, 2011, 01:01:30 PM »
This is a big step toward making players and coaches responsible for their actions. While we must remember that these are 18-23 year "kids,"  they are, officially, adults, and must learn to act like adults. We aren't their babysitters, so no more coaxing them into better behavior. The coaches will have to step up and take the lead on teaching their players sportsmanship. In the short term, we can probably expect to see an increase in UNS calls, until they get some self-control.  But, it won't take long.

Good for the NCAA.
« Last Edit: May 03, 2011, 04:36:20 PM by El Macman »

Diablo

  • Guest
Re: RR Notes re Mechanics Associated with Uns Conduct
« Reply #2 on: May 03, 2011, 01:39:10 PM »

Never understood why we were expected to save them from themselves.


I think the explanation is founded in the omnibenevolent concept of "preventive officiating".  Hopefully those in charge now see that the pendulum had swung to far to the left.

saofficial(aust)

  • Guest
Re: RR Notes re Mechanics Associated with Uns Conduct
« Reply #3 on: May 09, 2011, 04:24:42 PM »
About time this was addressed. We were never responsible for preventing or stopping this conduct once it was borderline or over the top. The responsibility is with the player, his captains, his team and his coaches.