Author Topic: Video Request-TX Tech  (Read 8211 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline JasonTX

  • *
  • Posts: 2997
  • FAN REACTION: +114/-59
Video Request-TX Tech
« on: November 19, 2011, 04:36:07 PM »
TXMike or someone.  With around 10 mins. left in the 3rd qtr. there was a flag thrown by the U for a false start.  Line judge comes running in and call was changed to defense offside.  I'd like to see that again if someone can post the video.

Offline TXMike

  • *
  • Posts: 8775
  • FAN REACTION: +229/-269
  • When you quit learning you quit living
Re: Video Request-TX Tech
« Reply #1 on: November 19, 2011, 09:33:02 PM »
Berry berry strange....

http://youtu.be/BOVJQ3VmRdM

Offline clearwall

  • *
  • Posts: 758
  • FAN REACTION: +14/-13
Re: Video Request-TX Tech
« Reply #2 on: November 19, 2011, 09:39:10 PM »
False start. The B player wasnt a) in the neutral zone and b) not close enough to the A player to have drawn him to move.

Offline TxSkyBolt

  • *
  • Posts: 2007
  • FAN REACTION: +45/-46
Video Request-TX Tech
« Reply #3 on: November 19, 2011, 09:39:55 PM »
Same official had a similar call in the Texas earlier this season.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline NVFOA_Ump

  • *
  • Posts: 4199
  • FAN REACTION: +107/-351
  • High School (MA & RI)
    • Massachusetts Independent Football Officials Association
Re: Video Request-TX Tech
« Reply #4 on: November 20, 2011, 06:44:03 AM »
I'd agree that this is not offside by B.  The B player who "moves early" does not encroach in the NZ, and the A player who moves is not by rule a threatened player.  Can't the U help out here with some advice if the wing officials think that the B player actually did enter the NZ?

(Corrected - had a late night and my vision is impaired.  8]   ;D)
« Last Edit: November 20, 2011, 06:56:02 AM by NVFOA_Ump »
It's easy to get the players, getting 'em to play together, that's the hard part. - Casey Stengel

Offline TXMike

  • *
  • Posts: 8775
  • FAN REACTION: +229/-269
  • When you quit learning you quit living
Re: Video Request-TX Tech
« Reply #5 on: November 20, 2011, 06:48:53 AM »
I'd agree that this has to be offside by B.  The B player who "moves early" does not encroach in the NZ, and the A player who moves is not by rule a threatened player.  Can't the U help out here with some advice if the wing officials think that the B player actually did enter the NZ?

Is this a typo or is it just too early up there?  How is it offside by B?

Offline JasonTX

  • *
  • Posts: 2997
  • FAN REACTION: +114/-59
Re: Video Request-TX Tech
« Reply #6 on: November 20, 2011, 07:15:07 PM »
Same official had a similar call in the Texas earlier this season.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I remember the earlier one as well from that Texas game.  I think it is posted on refstripes as well. 

LittleWhistle

  • Guest
Re: Video Request-TX Tech
« Reply #7 on: November 20, 2011, 09:38:31 PM »
Looks like the DE is more than 4-5 yards outside of the G who reacts.


Grant - AR

  • Guest
Re: Video Request-TX Tech
« Reply #8 on: November 21, 2011, 09:50:50 AM »
I remember the earlier one as well from that Texas game.  I think it is posted on refstripes as well.


I think this is the thread you are referring to:  www.refstripes.com/forum/index.php?topic=8525.0

There is speculation in the first post that the Big12 may have a little different philosophy on this type of play.

Offline Birddog

  • *
  • Posts: 211
  • FAN REACTION: +2/-2
Re: Video Request-TX Tech
« Reply #9 on: November 22, 2011, 09:22:02 AM »
I think Grant is right, it's a Big 12 philosophy over riding an actual rule.  When the defense moves and offense reacts, stick the defense with offside.  Watch a lot of Big 12 games and this is a common occurrence.