Author Topic: While we're talking about rule changes...  (Read 11146 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline KWH

  • *
  • Posts: 721
  • FAN REACTION: +633/-113
  • See it, Think about it, Pass on it if possible!
Re: While we're talking about rule changes...
« Reply #50 on: December 30, 2019, 01:45:29 PM »
XXX

PLEASE DELETE ME   :puke:
« Last Edit: January 02, 2020, 10:26:02 AM by KWH »
SEE everything that you CALL, but; Don't CALL everything you SEE!
Never let the Rules Book get in the way of a great ball game!

Respectfully Submitted;
Some guy on a message forum

Offline KWH

  • *
  • Posts: 721
  • FAN REACTION: +633/-113
  • See it, Think about it, Pass on it if possible!
Re: While we're talking about rule changes...
« Reply #51 on: December 30, 2019, 02:15:47 PM »

KWH...the issue with your example is if it combines this 2nd level UNR with a traditional UNS for an ejection as well. I think that's an over complicated solution compared to just making non-play related physical acts a UNS. It's worked pretty well in NCAA and not really hard to apply and enforce. If the NFHS rules committee ever does consider this, the simpler solution would just be to define certain physical acts to be UNS.

Brian -
While I agree with you it works well in NCAA, again, all I am simply saying is it is not likely you will ever see upgrading a PF to a UNS in NFHS in our lifetimes.
That doesn't mean we can't get there!

Yes, I would agree (1) 2nd level UNR combined with (1)  UNS would result in (1) DQ! And, I don't think that overcomplicates anything.
 
Which we can discuss it more over a beer!
 
« Last Edit: January 02, 2020, 10:24:05 AM by KWH »
SEE everything that you CALL, but; Don't CALL everything you SEE!
Never let the Rules Book get in the way of a great ball game!

Respectfully Submitted;
Some guy on a message forum