0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Either off-set the fouls and replay or enforce the K BIB from either end of the kick or spot of the foul. The play is not very specific as to where the foul occurred.
PSK?
A scrimmage kick without a new series occurring = clock starts on RFP.... UNLESS: (1) Kick out of bounds (2) Touchback Who's got the answers PS : If time expired during the down, an untimed down would be allowed.
Wouldn't either a kick out of bounds or a touchback result in a new series being awarded to R?
Ump33, you win the Kewpie doll . I had intended (1) to be OOB or TB but wasn't clear. Listing them separately now leaves a 3rd situation.
Still a' looking for that 3rd situation. Hint: IMHO, this situation should have been removed in 1996.
Rationale : if R called for a fair catch and chose to free kick, the clock should start on the kick, not the RFP.
Why:Isn't 3-4-3j removed ?
The NL not adopt the DH ?
Brady throw his telephone away ?
But since it's a free kick, it doesn't start on the kick, it starts when the kick is touched (other than first touching) It should have been "as a kick"-my bad./glow]It's probably not needed anymore. If there isn't going to be a change of possession, do we really need to wait for the snap? A few years after the COP timing change ,we had K with a 6 man line (11 man football) and a booming kick that was fair caught. After measuring off K's penalty, I started the clock on RFP. It was much later that I realized I shouldn't have had. I owe the Brewer vs Hampden game of 1998 probably 10-12 more seconds. I've yet to pay them back.The more important question is, why has the AL kept it? It ain't baseball! I used to enjoy watching chestmasters think before their next move. I never enjoyed watching a manager think as to if it was time to bat for the pitcher.I think we all know the answer to that one.
Or as unlikely as it is result of play is safety. So basically we are saying any major clock stopper
The more important question is, why has the AL kept it? It ain't baseball!
Kewpie Doll for Bossman. Clock always starts on snap after a fair catch. Rationale : if R called for a fair catch and chose to free kick, the clock should start as on the kick,not the RFP. IMHO, rationale became defunct in 1996 when rule changed to snap on all COPs. Why: Isn't 3-4-3j removed ? The NL not adopt the DH ? Brady throw his telephone away ?....So many questions...so few answers.....
Some officials would go on the snap here because the interception was (in the way they read the rule) "awarding a new series" (because of the apparent change of possession). This editorial change would clear up any confusion.
These are the same officials that say a fumble by A out of B's end zone constitutes a play with a change in possession. They need to learn their definitions!