71
NCAA Discussion / Re: Variations on the quiz
« Last post by dammitbobby on June 10, 2026, 01:52:34 PM »That makes sense.
Here's my thoughts.
3a - while we may have "banked" the potential foul for violating the 2x2 rule (since it's not a foul until the snap), IMO once we kill the clock to address the injured player, we should just 'reset' whatever was banked since we will now have a new RFP. Outside of any infractions that potentiallyrequire a runoff due to the injured player (NCAA, not Texas HS), A does not get any advantage here; any deception would be negated by being required to have A31 sit out at least one play.
Bobby, I don’t think Jim intended for the game officials to interrupt the game for an injury time out. This is simply a player being substituted - more like a player who just needs a ‘breather’ and wants to come out. If the game is interrupted by a referee’s time out, then the whole SKF and numbering exceptions process starts over. I believe Jim is trying to highlight the fact that the new rule language, in its current state, does not address the relationship between the new rule and the substitution rules. To put it simply: If, after the “2 X 2” is established, a “2 X 2” lineman then moves and departs the field, as a substitute enters the game in that vacated position, does that constitute a ‘change of position’ by the departing player, and is, thus, an illegal formation foul at the snap? Or, is that perfectly legal? Personally, I am of the opinion that this is just a standard - legal - substitution, but I do not (yet) have authoritative information on this issue. If I am able to get such information, I will certainly advise.
3b - By (the new) rule, the fact that A49 has his hands above his knees is irrelevant - the 2x2 is required as soon as he 'takes his position.' As soon as they were 2x2, with the snapper in position, they are numbering exceptions, and the new rule verbiage explicitly says that once they are established as exceptions, they may not shift or move to another position. Substituting is not addressed in the new rule language, and in the absence of a prohibitive rule to the contrary, my opinion is that it is legal to substitute within the 2x2. A doesn't really get an advantage here anyways since we would always give B the opportunity to match up.
4a - The initial lineup is not legal, since it is not a SKF, and numbering requirements apply. However, it's not a foul until the snap, and since they shift to to make a legal SKF, with no over infractions, I think this is allowed, and legal.
4b -unless the argument is that adjusting his position counts as a shift or a move to another position, I see this as legal. numbering rules aren't in effect until the 2x2 exists, and I don't see adjusting position as being enough movement to make it a shift.
4c - A70 is not part of the 2x2 and is not a numbering exception, therefor there are no restrictions on him shifting or being in motion to maintain the SKF.
4d - By definition, A33 is not a back (shoulders facing sideline, not opponents' goal line) so there are no requirements or restrictions on him, and there is not a SKF yet because there is no 2x2. The 2x2 requirements activate when A32 lines up, which then prohibits any shifts or moves to a different position, so when A31 - who is part of the 2x2 - moves into the shield, this is an ILS foul at the snap.
I'm sure I missing key elements here, feel free to pick my logic apart.
A 1st down could be achieved by a roughing foul (RTP,RTK,RTH, & RTS)or a bad FGA that is touched beyond the LOS by R and recovered by K.Understood, but they do not say that the chains will not be used. Or maybe an alternate would be that it's "always goal to go" unless a 1st down is awarded by penalty? IMHO that's pretty important to understanding the OT rules.
So the penalty statement in the latest online book is wrong? "PENALTY—10 yards. Penalties for Team A fouls behind the neutral zone are enforced from the previous spot. Safety if the foul occurs behind Team A’s goal line. [S43]."
For the exact reasons you state, this is illegal use of hands, and includes an automatic first down.
Players in this situation are also subject to the various blocking rules (9-3-3, 9-3-4, 9-3-5).
In this case, the contact is a foul for an Illegal Block in the Back (9-3-5) since B52 is not attempting to reach the ball or a ball carrier. 10 yards added to the end of A2's run. 3/1 @ A's39.