Thanks for trying, Maven, and time's up guys.
There would be a flag for free kicking OOB. Such touching by R is ignored if it is caused by K legally batting or muffing the ball (first touching) into R. R could also have K re kick from the 35 or take the ball at the 5 along with your two choices. (6-2-4, 6.1.8G , 8-1). 
OK Ralph, I have to send you back to the book on this one.
First, you cite 6-2-4, which applies only to scrimmage kicks. This is a free kick.
Second, the parallel rule about touching during a free kick is 6-1-5. But notice what it says: "Such
touching in the neutral zone by R is ignored if it is caused by K pushing or blocking R into contact with the ball or if K muffs the ball into contact with R." This clause excludes touching by R
in the neutral zone, which is reinforced by the case play you cite, 6.1.8G. We don't want K getting cheap recoveries
in the NZ.
In your play, the touching by R was NOT in the NZ. The kick was from the R-30, and the touch by R was at the R-19. So R's touching is NOT ignored by rule. Therefore, NOT a free kick OOB untouched by R.
QED