Author Topic: My HL and I disagree on a ruling  (Read 16062 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Bugolathe

  • *
  • Posts: 178
  • FAN REACTION: +14/-11
  • KSHSAA/Kansas
My HL and I disagree on a ruling
« on: February 06, 2015, 12:15:34 AM »
I'll bet I'm overthinking this one but help me settle a dispute (one of many) between me and my HL.

1st and 10 from A's 20.  A1 goes back to pass.  Before the ball is thrown, B1 grabs and pulls A2's FM at A's 40.  A1 then completes a pass to A2 at the 50.  How is enforced and by what rule?  I'll be anxious to see who is correct.  Thanks. tiphat:

Offline goodgrr

  • Roger Goodgroves
  • *
  • Posts: 336
  • FAN REACTION: +13/-12
  • We are always learning
Re: My HL and I disagree on a ruling
« Reply #1 on: February 06, 2015, 06:05:54 AM »
7-3 ARTICLE 12.
Penalties for personal fouls by Team B during a completed legal forward pass
play are enforced at the end of the last run when it ends beyond the neutral
zone. If the pass is incomplete or intercepted, or if there is a change of team
possession during the down, the penalty is enforced at the previous spot. (Rule
9-1 Penalty) (A. R. 7-3-12-I and 9-1-2-III)

Offline Kalle

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 3461
  • FAN REACTION: +114/-35
Re: My HL and I disagree on a ruling
« Reply #2 on: February 06, 2015, 06:45:30 AM »
7-3 ARTICLE 12.
Penalties for personal fouls by Team B during a completed legal forward pass
play are enforced at the end of the last run when it ends beyond the neutral
zone. If the pass is incomplete or intercepted, or if there is a change of team
possession during the down, the penalty is enforced at the previous spot. (Rule
9-1 Penalty) (A. R. 7-3-12-I and 9-1-2-III)

This is the NCAA rule, right? I don't think there is a similar rule in the NF, which the question is about.

Offline goodgrr

  • Roger Goodgroves
  • *
  • Posts: 336
  • FAN REACTION: +13/-12
  • We are always learning
Re: My HL and I disagree on a ruling
« Reply #3 on: February 06, 2015, 06:45:44 AM »
Sorry ignore me, just noticed this was an Fed post

Offline goodgrr

  • Roger Goodgroves
  • *
  • Posts: 336
  • FAN REACTION: +13/-12
  • We are always learning
Re: My HL and I disagree on a ruling
« Reply #4 on: February 06, 2015, 06:46:25 AM »
This is the NCAA rule, right? I don't think there is a similar rule in the NF, which the question is about.

Yes sorry you got there quicker than my retraction

Offline Ump33

  • *
  • Posts: 265
  • FAN REACTION: +8/-3
Re: My HL and I disagree on a ruling
« Reply #5 on: February 06, 2015, 06:49:07 AM »
Last year RTP was changes to include "No defensive player shall commit any illegal personal contact foul listed in 9-4-3 against the passer." By definition, the QB is not a "passer" until he throws a legal forward pass (2-32-11).

In the OP, since the foul happened before the ball was thrown, A2 was a runner and RTP would not apply. If the FM foul is accepted, it would be enforced from the Previous Spot since it happened during a Loose Ball Play.

Offline Kalle

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 3461
  • FAN REACTION: +114/-35
Re: My HL and I disagree on a ruling
« Reply #6 on: February 06, 2015, 07:09:26 AM »
In the OP, since the foul happened before the ball was thrown, A2 was a runner and RTP would not apply. If the FM foul is accepted, it would be enforced from the Previous Spot since it happened during a Loose Ball Play.

Actually, A2 is the receiver, A1 is the passer (this is why I prefer play situations to have real player numbers, less confusion).

Offline bama_stripes

  • *
  • Posts: 3205
  • FAN REACTION: +126/-29
Re: My HL and I disagree on a ruling
« Reply #7 on: February 06, 2015, 07:36:45 AM »
A will decline the FM penalty and take the ball at the 50.  Loose ball play, ABO enforcement.

Offline HLinNC

  • *
  • Posts: 3491
  • FAN REACTION: +133/-24
Re: My HL and I disagree on a ruling
« Reply #8 on: February 06, 2015, 08:00:43 AM »
Quote
Sorry ignore me, just noticed this was an Fed post

Well, we are on the Fed board :!# >:D ;D

Offline bossman72

  • *
  • Posts: 2388
  • FAN REACTION: +312/-29
Re: My HL and I disagree on a ruling
« Reply #9 on: February 06, 2015, 08:10:21 AM »
Previous spot or declined.  Officials will mess this one up!

Offline VALJ

  • *
  • Posts: 2466
  • FAN REACTION: +95/-15
Re: My HL and I disagree on a ruling
« Reply #10 on: February 06, 2015, 08:13:04 AM »
A will decline the FM penalty and take the ball at the 50.  Loose ball play, ABO enforcement.

Agreed.  The foul came before the pass.

Offline Ralph Damren

  • *
  • Posts: 5152
  • FAN REACTION: +875/-28
  • SEE IT-THINK IT-CALL IT
Re: My HL and I disagree on a ruling
« Reply #11 on: February 06, 2015, 08:26:14 AM »
Know the 4 W's :

                who, what, WHEN, where tiphat:

                  :patrioticon: aWaRd aWaRd aWaRd aWaRd :patrioticon:

Offline Ump33

  • *
  • Posts: 265
  • FAN REACTION: +8/-3
Re: My HL and I disagree on a ruling
« Reply #12 on: February 06, 2015, 08:57:52 AM »
Actually, A2 is the receiver, A1 is the passer (this is why I prefer play situations to have real player numbers, less confusion).

Thanks, I totally misread the OP.

Offline AlUpstateNY

  • *
  • Posts: 4846
  • FAN REACTION: +344/-1000
Re: My HL and I disagree on a ruling
« Reply #13 on: February 06, 2015, 11:03:15 AM »
Well, we are on the Fed board :!# >:D ;D

Different rules and interpretations for differnt levels, playing under different codes.  Not necessarily better or worse, just different, which creates an added burden when working multiple levels.

Offline Kalle

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 3461
  • FAN REACTION: +114/-35
Re: My HL and I disagree on a ruling
« Reply #14 on: February 06, 2015, 11:16:30 AM »
Well, we are on the Fed board :!# >:D ;D

If you read posts via the "show unread posts since last visit", it is easy to confuse NF, NCAA and NFL boards.

Offline HLinNC

  • *
  • Posts: 3491
  • FAN REACTION: +133/-24
Re: My HL and I disagree on a ruling
« Reply #15 on: February 06, 2015, 04:26:18 PM »
Quote from: HLinNC on Today at 08:00:43 AM
Well, we are on the Fed board :!# >:D ;D

Different rules and interpretations for differnt levels, playing under different codes.  Not necessarily better or worse, just different, which creates an added burden when working multiple levels.

Thanks, Captain Obvious.

Offline AlUpstateNY

  • *
  • Posts: 4846
  • FAN REACTION: +344/-1000
Re: My HL and I disagree on a ruling
« Reply #16 on: February 07, 2015, 09:33:48 AM »
Quote from: HLinNC on Today at 08:00:43 AM
Well, we are on the Fed board :!# >:D ;D

Different rules and interpretations for differnt levels, playing under different codes.  Not necessarily better or worse, just different, which creates an added burden when working multiple levels.

Thanks, Captain Obvious.

Well, maybe not so obvious to those who presume that because something is done, and may work well, a certain way at one level, it MUST automatically apply to all levels.

Offline Bugolathe

  • *
  • Posts: 178
  • FAN REACTION: +14/-11
  • KSHSAA/Kansas
Re: My HL and I disagree on a ruling
« Reply #17 on: February 07, 2015, 09:55:46 AM »
Thanks to all of you that responded.  :)  When I first looked at this, I really wanted to tack it on the EOR but that just didn't seem right.  This ruling seems to be a fair one IMO. 


Offline goodgrr

  • Roger Goodgroves
  • *
  • Posts: 336
  • FAN REACTION: +13/-12
  • We are always learning
Re: My HL and I disagree on a ruling
« Reply #18 on: February 08, 2015, 02:18:55 AM »
If you read posts via the "show unread posts since last visit", it is easy to confuse NF, NCAA and NFL boards.

Yes that's exactly what happened, no excuses though it says it just under the "new" link