Author Topic: Posted for discussion  (Read 12360 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline BrendanP

  • *
  • Posts: 350
  • FAN REACTION: +19/-252
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Posted for discussion
« on: November 02, 2015, 06:38:27 PM »
https://gma.yahoo.com/high-school-football-player-ejected-praising-god-end-201359928--abc-news-topstories.html?cid=fb_gma_sf

There's got to be more to this story. I really hate that this has become political fodder, but like I say, there HAS to be more to this than is being presented.

Offline DallasLJ

  • *
  • Posts: 568
  • FAN REACTION: +16/-15
Re: Posted for discussion
« Reply #1 on: November 02, 2015, 07:50:56 PM »
No big issue -- 2 UNS is an automatic disqualification.  I am assuming the official thought the action was prolonged.  I am all in favor of prayer -- take it to the sideline.  I always try to tell the player that scores to go find a teammate to celebrate with.  Anytime you do any act, any act, by yourself, you expose yourself to a flag.  Football is a team sport.  Individual act takes away from the fact that the scoring player got all those great blocks that allowed him to score. Not to many can score by themselves against 11 defenders.

  Just my humble opinion and what I have learned watching this rule evolve over the last 20+ years.

Offline BrendanP

  • *
  • Posts: 350
  • FAN REACTION: +19/-252
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: Posted for discussion
« Reply #2 on: November 02, 2015, 08:08:01 PM »
That would explain it. I got wind of this through a local paper, where someone had written one of those short editorial pieces screaming that this is more evidence of the "criminalization of Christianity" and that deeply offends me both as a referee and a non-believer. No I wouldn't have flagged it, but what's done is done and from what I read, the school is in talks with the conference to see if the kid can be reinstated for next week's game. I never thought our avocation would come into the subject of politics! Sports is one of the most non-political topics you can talk about!  nAnA ;)

Offline Legacy Zebra

  • *
  • Posts: 1029
  • FAN REACTION: +56/-11
Re: Posted for discussion
« Reply #3 on: November 02, 2015, 08:15:12 PM »
That whole article is useless without video. Plus the fact that it fails to mention that a second UNS (or USC since this is a Fed game) is an auto-DQ. It wasn't like the official saw him praying and tossed him for it. Also, I like that the writer refers to his first unsportsmanlike foul as an "aggressive argument". I'm sure that's all it was, just arguing with an opponent.  ::)

Offline Eastshire

  • *
  • Posts: 92
  • FAN REACTION: +6/-2
Re: Posted for discussion
« Reply #4 on: November 03, 2015, 07:08:33 AM »
There's video in the high school forum thread about this.

Offline Ralph Damren

  • *
  • Posts: 5093
  • FAN REACTION: +874/-28
  • SEE IT-THINK IT-CALL IT
Re: Posted for discussion
« Reply #5 on: November 03, 2015, 07:37:51 AM »
IMHO, 10-5-1c (Any delayed, excessive or prolonged act....) is purely subjective.

IMHO, most of us wouldn't  ^flag it.

IMHO, some of us would  ^flag.

IMHO, pushing the envelope on a subjective rule is like playing Russian Roulette; most of the time nothing will happen...but sometime it will...maybe at the least opportune moment.

IMHO, the player had already drew one USC ^flag and as Dean Wormer once said : " (He) was on 'double secret ' probation".

IMHO, when one arrives in the end zone, one should act like one is in familiar surroundings. tiphat:

Offline Ralph Damren

  • *
  • Posts: 5093
  • FAN REACTION: +874/-28
  • SEE IT-THINK IT-CALL IT
Re: Posted for discussion
« Reply #6 on: November 03, 2015, 08:42:27 AM »
There's video in the high school forum thread about this.
The video in the NFHS forum is about a player in upstate NY, I believe this is in Arizona.

Offline Rulesman

  • Past Keeper of the Keys
  • Refstripes Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 3839
  • FAN REACTION: +65535/-2
  • Live like tomorrow never comes.
Re: Posted for discussion
« Reply #7 on: November 03, 2015, 11:42:13 AM »
IMHO, 10-5-1c (Any delayed, excessive or prolonged act....) is purely subjective.

IMHO, most of us wouldn't  ^flag it.

IMHO, some of us would  ^flag.

IMHO, pushing the envelope on a subjective rule is like playing Russian Roulette; most of the time nothing will happen...but sometime it will...maybe at the least opportune moment.

IMHO, the player had already drew one USC ^flag and as Dean Wormer once said : " (He) was on 'double secret ' probation".

IMHO, when one arrives in the end zone, one should act like one is in familiar surroundings. tiphat:
:thumbup :thumbup
"Gentlemen, we are going to relentlessly chase perfection, knowing full well we will not catch it, because nothing is perfect. But we are going to relentlessly chase it, because in the process we will catch excellence. I am not remotely interested in just being good."
- Vince Lombardi

Offline hefnerjm

  • *
  • Posts: 331
  • FAN REACTION: +19/-23
  • Everyone needs a student, a mentor, & a friend
Re: Posted for discussion
« Reply #8 on: November 03, 2015, 01:55:36 PM »
  I always try to tell the player that scores to go find a teammate to celebrate with.  Anytime you do any act, any act, by yourself, you expose yourself to a flag.

This seems counter to what I have seen taught.  Granted, I am relatively new and dont have anywhere close to 20 years...I've been taught that group celebrations are more likely to draw flags. 

If you have a player take a knee in the EZ and point skywards, I got nothing.  If you have a group of players in the EZ do anything pre-meditated, then you have to stop and think.

Assuming the ball isnt used as a prop, and the player doesnt commit one of the "automatics" (NCAA FR-93 Rule 9-2-1-a), or something equally egregious, I cant see flagging this.

But as someone else already mentioned, without video and context, its hard to speculate.
Coach: "I've been doing this 30 years!  I know the rules!"
Ref: "Are you married coach?"
Coach (suddenly offguard): "umm...yeah, why?"
Ref: "I've been married 30 years and my wife says there is still room for improvement"
Coach: "<silence>"

Offline DallasLJ

  • *
  • Posts: 568
  • FAN REACTION: +16/-15
Re: Posted for discussion
« Reply #9 on: November 03, 2015, 02:09:08 PM »
This seems counter to what I have seen taught.  Granted, I am relatively new and dont have anywhere close to 20 years...I've been taught that group celebrations are more likely to draw flags. 

If you have a player take a knee in the EZ and point skywards, I got nothing.  If you have a group of players in the EZ do anything pre-meditated, then you have to stop and think.

Assuming the ball isnt used as a prop, and the player doesnt commit one of the "automatics" (NCAA FR-93 Rule 9-2-1-a), or something equally egregious, I cant see flagging this.

But as someone else already mentioned, without video and context, its hard to speculate.

  You misunderstand.  No pre-meditated, planned out celebrations -- but a quick high five, hug a teammate etc. is what you are looking for.  When a player does something by himself, he risks prolonging the act, which is then an act designed to draw attention to yourself which is the UNS foul.  So, quick knee and point, probably okay . . . but you take the knee and point for 4 seconds probably a flag . . . Best not to get into timing -- so find a teammate, high five and hugs all around as you are heading off the field, and save the prayer for he sideline.

Offline yarnnelg

  • *
  • Posts: 941
  • FAN REACTION: +55/-37
Re: Posted for discussion
« Reply #10 on: November 03, 2015, 05:07:27 PM »
I will not be surprised to see the additional suspension overturned. After a USC from an argument earlier, we were always careful to make sure that the next act begged for the ejection. Do Not go gunning for anyone. This player is walking out of the endzone with a hand raised. We do not have an audio to hear whether or not the player is shouting "Praise God" or anything else.

Offline SD_Casey

  • *
  • Posts: 138
  • FAN REACTION: +8/-1
Posted for discussion
« Reply #11 on: November 03, 2015, 06:43:22 PM »
The BJ was awfully quick on that flag. The question almost asks itself.  What was the first UNS for?

If it was for a similar act but longer and designed to draw attention, I could see going with a flag on this. Did it once and got flagged.  Doing it again (no matter how small) is daring them to throw a flag.

I'm not sure if that's what happened here but it seems plausible given how small the act was and how quickly the BJ launched that flag.

Offline MSWBKLYN

  • *
  • Posts: 12
  • FAN REACTION: +3/-0
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: Posted for discussion
« Reply #12 on: November 03, 2015, 07:50:10 PM »

Offline riffraft

  • *
  • Posts: 335
  • FAN REACTION: +19/-19
Re: Posted for discussion
« Reply #13 on: November 05, 2015, 09:23:46 AM »
I watched the game on HUDL hoping to see the first USC, couldn't find it. However looking at the second USC, I can see why the umpire threw the flag unless the player said something with the gesture. I do wish that the people who are discussing this would put in the fact that he wasn't ejected because of the gesture. He was ejected because of the 2nd USC. My guess is, if the first USC hadn't happened, we would not have even heard about him being called for the gesture. 

Offline bama_stripes

  • *
  • Posts: 3164
  • FAN REACTION: +124/-29
Re: Posted for discussion
« Reply #14 on: November 05, 2015, 09:47:26 AM »
This seems counter to what I have seen taught.  Granted, I am relatively new and dont have anywhere close to 20 years...I've been taught that group celebrations are more likely to draw flags.

Spontaneous short celebration with several teammates:   :thumbup

"Doing choreography":   ^flag