« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: 10-4-2 Exception Again!  (Read 4322 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sczeebra

  • *
  • Posts: 192
  • FAN REACTION: +5/-7
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
10-4-2 Exception Again!
« on: July 03, 2024, 05:51:28 PM »
This has been beat around the bush plenty. We were having some discussion and Rule 8-3-6a was entered. My question; How can  a penalty by K be obviously declined when they can take the result of play,(an unsuccessful try) and have it enforced at the succeeding spot? To me there needs to be some clarification here or toss 8-3-6a out. Thanks as always and have a great upcoming season.
Logged

Offline NVFOA_Ump

  • *
  • Posts: 4200
  • FAN REACTION: +107/-351
  • High School (MA & RI)
    • Massachusetts Independent Football Officials Association
Re: 10-4-2 Exception Again!
« Reply #1 on: July 04, 2024, 04:50:24 PM »
Which team will "be next to put the ball in play" following a try down?
Logged
It's easy to get the players, getting 'em to play together, that's the hard part. - Casey Stengel

Offline ncwingman

  • *
  • Posts: 1469
  • FAN REACTION: +78/-21
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: 10-4-2 Exception Again!
« Reply #2 on: July 04, 2024, 05:29:48 PM »
Quote from: NVFOA_Ump on July 04, 2024, 04:50:24 PM
Which team will "be next to put the ball in play" following a try down?

That's R's decision, per 8-4-9. Can they elect to kick and have the foul enforced from the succeeding spot? Obviously, that contradicts 8-4-6a, so the answer should be "No"... but what if? Maybe?
Logged

Offline sczeebra

  • *
  • Posts: 192
  • FAN REACTION: +5/-7
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: 10-4-2 Exception Again!
« Reply #3 on: July 04, 2024, 07:32:23 PM »
NVFOA_ump is correct! R has to be next to put the ball in play.
« Last Edit: July 05, 2024, 04:01:55 AM by sczeebra »
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »