Author Topic: Invalid fair catch signal situation  (Read 13895 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

kentholm

  • Guest
Invalid fair catch signal situation
« on: August 04, 2011, 08:13:30 PM »
Looking for others' thoughts on this scenario:

R12 gives an invalid fair catch signal, catches the punt and then gets tackled by K35.  R12 made no attempt to run after making the catch (and judging by his action thought he had made a valid fair catch signal).  Assuming K35's tackle is just a good clean tackle what do you have?

Again, just looking for perspectives on this.
Thanks,

Offline SWilliams

  • *
  • Posts: 24
  • FAN REACTION: +0/-1
    • www.penaltycard.com
Re: Invalid fair catch signal situation
« Reply #1 on: August 04, 2011, 09:19:51 PM »
What makes the fair catch signal illegal in your scenario?
Scott Williams
Little Rock, Arkansas

www.penaltycard.com

Offline zebraken

  • *
  • Posts: 87
  • FAN REACTION: +1/-3
Re: Invalid fair catch signal situation
« Reply #2 on: August 04, 2011, 09:53:50 PM »
5yd penaly on R enforced as psk.....dead ball personal foul. 15 yards against K

kentholm

  • Guest
Re: Invalid fair catch signal situation
« Reply #3 on: August 04, 2011, 10:13:08 PM »
What makes the fair catch signal illegal in your scenario?

Receiver doesn't wave a fully extended arm back and forth.

Offline HLinNC

  • *
  • Posts: 3491
  • FAN REACTION: +133/-24
Re: Invalid fair catch signal situation
« Reply #4 on: August 04, 2011, 10:30:54 PM »
No foul

Quote
*6.5.3 SITUATION: R1 signals for a fair catch of a scrimmage kick by K1.
Teammate R2 catches the kick and is tackled immediately by K1 who did or did
not have a chance to see the signal. The contact which was not a personal foul
occurred before the covering official sounded his whistle. R2 fumbles when tackled
and the ball is recovered by K2. RULING: The ball became dead when it was
caught by R2. The contact by K1 was not a foul because R2 did not signal for a
fair catch. R2 fumbled a dead ball and there could be no recovery by K2. COMMENT:
Contacting a receiver who did not give a fair-catch signal or contacting a
receiver who has given a signal but is contacted where he cannot make a fair
catch, is not a foul unless the contact is judged to be a personal foul. The receiver
is not afforded special protection in such situations. Members of the kicking
team have the responsibility for knowing when the ball is dead. If a kicker could
not have seen a fair-catch signal made by the teammate of the receiver, there is
no foul. However, if he could have seen the signal, he does not have license to
contact the receiver. (4-2-2g)

Reddings: "Contacting..........., a receiver who has given and invalid signal, .............is not a foul unless the contact is judged to be unnecessary roughness or some other type of personal foul."

Offline zebraken

  • *
  • Posts: 87
  • FAN REACTION: +1/-3
Re: Invalid fair catch signal situation
« Reply #5 on: August 05, 2011, 07:49:56 AM »
wouldnt there be a foul for the invalid fair catch signal?

Offline AlUpstateNY

  • *
  • Posts: 4844
  • FAN REACTION: +344/-1000
Re: Invalid fair catch signal situation
« Reply #6 on: August 05, 2011, 09:54:50 AM »
A secondary consideration is "when" was either an invalid, or even valid signal, given.  The onus is on the receiver to give a signal that allows a charging member of K a "reasonable" opportunity to react properly to it.  "Reasonable" is decided (totally) by the covering official.

In the sample play, there should clearly be a flag and a foul.  The covering officials decides whether it's Invalid FC Signal or Kick Catching Interference, but it shouldn't be both.

ECILLJ

  • Guest
Re: Invalid fair catch signal situation
« Reply #7 on: August 05, 2011, 11:20:49 AM »
It seems if there is enough time for R to make a decision not to run, there would be time for the BJ to blow his whistle and give time for K to pull up. This play could easily happen in HS. 

mbyron

  • Guest
Re: Invalid fair catch signal situation
« Reply #8 on: August 05, 2011, 11:33:13 AM »
No foul on K. An invalid fair catch signal makes the ball dead once caught by R (so R cannot advance), but does not protect R from contact. Since the OP said the contact by K was not otherwise a foul, there is no foul on K.

Flag R for the invalid fair catch signal.

Offline Ump33

  • *
  • Posts: 265
  • FAN REACTION: +8/-3
Re: Invalid fair catch signal situation
« Reply #9 on: August 05, 2011, 12:21:42 PM »
No foul on K. An invalid fair catch signal makes the ball dead once caught by R (so R cannot advance), but does not protect R from contact. Since the OP said the contact by K was not otherwise a foul, there is no foul on K.

Flag R for the invalid fair catch signal.

Agree with mbyron ... Also, this would be PSK Enforcement

Offline Tom.OH

  • *
  • Posts: 408
  • FAN REACTION: +7/-0
Re: Invalid fair catch signal situation
« Reply #10 on: August 05, 2011, 03:43:03 PM »
I have only worked back judge a few times but I always tell the receiver to make sure he gives me a good signal, then I watch for it.
"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. And inside of a dog, it's to dark to read."
Groucho Marx

Offline VALJ

  • *
  • Posts: 2466
  • FAN REACTION: +95/-15
Re: Invalid fair catch signal situation
« Reply #11 on: August 05, 2011, 03:45:19 PM »
I have only worked back judge a few times but I always tell the receiver to make sure he gives me a good signal, then I watch for it.

What he said.  I've only done B as a 5 man crew, but I've waited until after I tell the deep man/men that before heading over towards the sideline.

Offline HLinNC

  • *
  • Posts: 3491
  • FAN REACTION: +133/-24
Re: Invalid fair catch signal situation
« Reply #12 on: August 05, 2011, 04:03:08 PM »
Quote
wouldnt there be a foul for the invalid fair catch signal?


Given that the OP already stated there was an invalid fair catch, I was commenting on his "what do we have" regarding the K player's "clean tackle".