It was ugly. I don't think this has the play after IR finally finished but it has the rest.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXzxzZod4Io
It went something like this:
1. Initial onfield ruling - touchdown
2. Ruling after discussion - no touchdown - 4th down fumble recovered by different player. Ball at 1/2 yd line. (how they came up with this stretches the imagination).
3. Replay: "Something is confirmed"
4. Onfield ruling after another discussion:: Touchdown - fumble actually recovered by fumbling player
5. Replay: No touchdown ball at 6" line
Ruling should have been ball at about the 1 yd line which is the foremost point of the ball when knee and shin are down.
All of this took 6+ minutes to work through. And I would suggest "player" is a better term to use than "boy".