Targeting Review Timeline

[Suudy]

In the Washington State/Northern Colorado game there was no foul for targeting (I think there was a PF called on WSU, but it wasn’t targeting).  NC lined up for the next play, and a false start was called on NC.  The white hat then announced that after review, there was targeting and a WSU player was disqualified.  They then said the FS was ignored.

I know technically no play was run, but it seemed odd to negate the FS.  Is this the right call?

[TXMike]

Can be reviewed until ball is next legally put in play

[Suudy]

Can be reviewed until ball is next legally put in play

I understand that.  I messed up the topic.  I mean why was the false start ignored?

[Magician]

Was it possible replay buzzed down before the false start so that act never technically happened?

[Kalle]

Was it possible replay buzzed down before the false start so that act never technically happened?

Actually the IR case book specifically says that a dead ball (5-yard?) foul after the play being reviewed and before the review starts is ignored. I think this is along the lines that all five yard penalties, which happen after the action should have been shut down but wasn't, are ignored.