« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: beanbagging  (Read 23072 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Curious

  • *
  • Posts: 1314
  • FAN REACTION: +36/-50
Re: beanbagging
« Reply #25 on: September 22, 2012, 05:58:59 PM »
Quote from: waltjp on September 21, 2012, 11:13:55 AM
Coach, using your logic we'd be bagging the spot of fumble recoveries, too.  We're only bagging the spot of an interception inside B's 5-yard line if his momentum carries him into the end zone.  Momentum is the reason, not the INT.

Walt, we DO bag fumbles for the enforcement spot (at least beyond the LOS) don't we......
Logged

Offline VALJ

  • *
  • Posts: 2465
  • FAN REACTION: +95/-15
Re: beanbagging
« Reply #26 on: September 24, 2012, 10:57:48 AM »
Quote from: Curious on September 22, 2012, 05:58:59 PM
Walt, we DO bag fumbles for the enforcement spot (at least beyond the LOS) don't we......

Spot of the fumble, not spot of the recovery.  Unless, as walt said, the spot of recover is a momentum spot.
« Last Edit: September 24, 2012, 11:04:24 AM by VALJ »
Logged

Offline Curious

  • *
  • Posts: 1314
  • FAN REACTION: +36/-50
Re: beanbagging
« Reply #27 on: September 24, 2012, 11:19:41 AM »
Quote from: VALJ on September 24, 2012, 10:57:48 AM
Spot of the fumble, not spot of the recovery.  Unless, as walt said, the spot of recover is a momentum spot.

Yeah, you're right - misread walt's post.  This whole topic has gotten too much attention for my taste anyway. cRaZy

As AB said: "distinction without difference".   Bombs (bags) away!!!
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
« previous next »