Author Topic: Western Michigan/Idaho targeting  (Read 4418 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

StudyingFutureZebra

  • Guest
Western Michigan/Idaho targeting
« on: September 14, 2014, 12:57:30 AM »
Now this one just boggles the mind. It shouldn't have even been called a late hit, as his arm grazes the QB's head, much less an actual helmet contact to the head. How in god's name wasn't that one overturned?
« Last Edit: September 14, 2014, 01:00:27 AM by StudyingFutureZebra »

Offline TxSkyBolt

  • *
  • Posts: 2007
  • FAN REACTION: +45/-46
Western Michigan/Idaho targeting
« Reply #1 on: September 14, 2014, 01:11:41 AM »
Didn't see the play but if it was targeting a defenseless player there doesn't need to be any helmet contact. Any forcible contact above the shoulders on a defenseless player is targeting.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Online Kalle

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 3442
  • FAN REACTION: +114/-35
Re: Western Michigan/Idaho targeting
« Reply #2 on: September 14, 2014, 03:00:58 AM »
And targeting does not need a helmet-to-helmet contact, it only requires (forcible) contact by any body part. Hitting with the crown of the helmet is a separate rule.

texref

  • Guest
Re: Western Michigan/Idaho targeting
« Reply #3 on: September 14, 2014, 03:23:58 PM »
Now this one just boggles the mind. It shouldn't have even been called a late hit, as his arm grazes the QB's head, much less an actual helmet contact to the head. How in god's name wasn't that one overturned?

BTW - Replay 'Confirmed' the Targeting call. You know as in Indisputable Video Evidence......

younggun

  • Guest
Re: Western Michigan/Idaho targeting
« Reply #4 on: September 14, 2014, 10:50:53 PM »