« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Bench "player" UNS  (Read 8692 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline InsideTheStripes

  • *
  • Posts: 272
  • FAN REACTION: +0/-5
Bench "player" UNS
« on: November 29, 2014, 07:18:36 PM »
While I'm glad the coaches did the right thing here, I'm not sure why they were given the chance.

Logged

Offline NorCalMike

  • *
  • Posts: 770
  • FAN REACTION: +23/-8
Re: Bench "player" UNS
« Reply #1 on: November 30, 2014, 02:35:45 AM »
Guess we can Blame Jameis for that one.
Logged

Offline bossman72

  • *
  • Posts: 2337
  • FAN REACTION: +310/-29
Re: Bench "player" UNS
« Reply #2 on: December 01, 2014, 07:57:35 AM »
Should that be an automatic DQ?  Which rule would support that?
Logged

Offline clearwall

  • *
  • Posts: 758
  • FAN REACTION: +14/-13
Re: Bench "player" UNS
« Reply #3 on: December 01, 2014, 10:00:09 AM »
Quote from: bossman72 on December 01, 2014, 07:57:35 AM
Should that be an automatic DQ?  Which rule would support that?

I would think you could call targeting on this. Used his helmet to hit him in the face.
Logged

Offline Legacy Zebra

  • *
  • Posts: 1029
  • FAN REACTION: +56/-11
Re: Bench "player" UNS
« Reply #4 on: December 01, 2014, 10:25:20 AM »
The problem with calling targeting here is that 92 was a substitute, not a player. 9-1-4 specifically says "No player shall..." If you felt this warranted an ejection, the justification would be flagrant unnecessary roughness. Under 9-1-1, all flagrant fouls require disqualification.
Logged

Offline psv

  • *
  • Posts: 279
  • FAN REACTION: +14/-14
Re: Bench "player" UNS
« Reply #5 on: December 01, 2014, 12:43:34 PM »
We flagged a kid for UNS who pushed an opponent on his sideline earlier this season (HS).  We didnt eject him, but that was his first. 

Not sure why this would be auto unless he punched him.  Good job on the crew for getting that. 
Logged

Offline clearwall

  • *
  • Posts: 758
  • FAN REACTION: +14/-13
Re: Bench "player" UNS
« Reply #6 on: December 01, 2014, 12:57:45 PM »
Yeah, just go 9-1-1 on him then? "Before the game, during the game, and between periods, all flagrant fouls require disqualification."
Logged

Offline Rulesman

  • Past Keeper of the Keys
  • Refstripes Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 3839
  • FAN REACTION: +65535/-2
  • Live like tomorrow never comes.
Re: Bench "player" UNS
« Reply #7 on: December 01, 2014, 02:23:27 PM »
Quote from: psv on December 01, 2014, 12:43:34 PM
Not sure why this would be auto unless he punched him.
It doesn't have to be a punch to be a flagrant foul.
Logged
"Gentlemen, we are going to relentlessly chase perfection, knowing full well we will not catch it, because nothing is perfect. But we are going to relentlessly chase it, because in the process we will catch excellence. I am not remotely interested in just being good."
- Vince Lombardi

Offline InsideTheStripes

  • *
  • Posts: 272
  • FAN REACTION: +0/-5
Re: Bench "player" UNS
« Reply #8 on: December 17, 2014, 07:40:28 PM »

It made the CFO post season video. 

RR says, "it would have been so much better if the officials had actually ejected the player from the game and announced that he has been disqualified in addition to the personal foul."
Logged

Offline goodgrr

  • Roger Goodgroves
  • *
  • Posts: 336
  • FAN REACTION: +13/-12
  • We are always learning
Re: Bench "player" UNS
« Reply #9 on: December 18, 2014, 02:24:33 AM »
Is there a way for non CFO officials to see the videos?  Looking on Arbiter brings up an authorisation error.

Would be really useful for me as we use NCAA rules (mostly).
Logged

Offline Kalle

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 3442
  • FAN REACTION: +114/-35
Re: Bench "player" UNS
« Reply #10 on: December 18, 2014, 06:39:08 AM »
You can sign up as an CFO official even if you are outside US (I did).
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »