Author Topic: Fumble pileup on 4th down, short of line to gain  (Read 13172 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

matrixwalker

  • Guest
Fumble pileup on 4th down, short of line to gain
« on: February 16, 2015, 12:10:30 AM »
I had this happen to me last season, 4th down, offense fumbles, players from both sides scramble for the ball, pileup is a good 5 yards short of the line to gain.  Since I knew it'd be a turnover no matter what, I didn't really bother to dig, just yelled "It's a turnover" and once the players un-piled, turned the ball over to the defense.  We conveniently ruled the defense recovered the fumble, but I suppose it really didn't matter.

How would you guys handle such a situation?

Offline prab

  • *
  • Posts: 669
  • FAN REACTION: +37/-47
  • Wherever you go, there you are!
Re: Fumble pileup on 4th down, short of line to gain
« Reply #1 on: February 16, 2015, 08:06:10 AM »
Seems to me that what you did worked.

All's well that ends well!

Offline AlUpstateNY

  • *
  • Posts: 4846
  • FAN REACTION: +344/-1000
Re: Fumble pileup on 4th down, short of line to gain
« Reply #2 on: February 16, 2015, 08:16:50 AM »
Perception often is reality, and "selling" your call can affect perception.  When you actually see who has recovered a loose ball, clearly and emphatically pointing in the proper direction answers the question of which team has possession. 

Verbal observations are useful to alert those involved in the recovery effort that the play is over, possession has been decided so there's no reason to continue actively pursuing possession.  The most effective tool official's have to control behavior is a strong voice alerting players to things they need to understand, but may not be aware of.

Offline Ralph Damren

  • *
  • Posts: 5152
  • FAN REACTION: +875/-28
  • SEE IT-THINK IT-CALL IT
Re: Fumble pileup on 4th down, short of line to gain
« Reply #3 on: February 16, 2015, 09:00:12 AM »
My only concern with yelling "turnover" is that if there had been an unnoticed flag against B ,the issues of did B really recover and did they do it with "clean hands". Check first to be sure there are no flags.

Yelling "turnover" could also possibly confuse the umpire sNiCkErS into thinking someone just returned from the bakery. eAt& :)

Offline ncwingman

  • *
  • Posts: 1510
  • FAN REACTION: +79/-22
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: Fumble pileup on 4th down, short of line to gain
« Reply #4 on: February 17, 2015, 09:48:33 AM »
My only concern with yelling "turnover" is that if there had been an unnoticed flag against B ,the issues of did B really recover and did they do it with "clean hands". Check first to be sure there are no flags.

Wouldn't that only matter if the foul was after change of possession, and in this case -- fumble into pile, ball dead as soon as recovered -- that would be a dead ball foul (or not a foul at all). If you have to dig for the ball in a pile, there's no live ball action after the change of possession and the "clean hands" provision is irrelevant, as a live ball foul on B would necessarily give them "dirty hands".

In general, I agree with you. In this specific case, it's sort of a moot point.

Offline prab

  • *
  • Posts: 669
  • FAN REACTION: +37/-47
  • Wherever you go, there you are!
Re: Fumble pileup on 4th down, short of line to gain
« Reply #5 on: February 17, 2015, 10:25:24 AM »
In general, I agree with you. In this specific case, it's sort of a moot point.

+1

Nice!!  The word "moot" is underutilized.  It just has that certain ring to it. 

Offline Ralph Damren

  • *
  • Posts: 5152
  • FAN REACTION: +875/-28
  • SEE IT-THINK IT-CALL IT
Re: Fumble pileup on 4th down, short of line to gain
« Reply #6 on: February 17, 2015, 10:32:30 AM »
I agree with Prab :thumbup for agreeing with NCwingman :thumbup. I was very moot, and will attempt to be mute instead of moot in future posts. I still do have a concern that yelling "TURNOVER" may bring a false sense of hunger to those that may feel the bakery truck has arrived. eAt&

Offline bama_stripes

  • *
  • Posts: 3205
  • FAN REACTION: +126/-29
Re: Fumble pileup on 4th down, short of line to gain
« Reply #7 on: February 17, 2015, 01:39:29 PM »
In general, I agree with you. In this specific case, it's sort of a moot point.

I don't think so.  There could be an "unseen" flag for any number of B fouls (illegal substitution, defensive holding, face-mask, etc.) that would give A a new series.

In addition, the "stat guys" would probably like to know if it was a recovered fumble or a turnover on downs.  At any rate -- what's the rush?

Offline Atlanta Blue

  • *
  • Posts: 3781
  • FAN REACTION: +160/-71
Re: Fumble pileup on 4th down, short of line to gain
« Reply #8 on: February 17, 2015, 02:05:36 PM »
In addition, the "stat guys" would probably like to know if it was a recovered fumble or a turnover on downs.  At any rate -- what's the rush?
Being one of them, I can guarantee you, if you don't call it one way or the other, I will.  Actually, I have to, it has to be recorded one way or the other.

Now, in HS, no overseeing body is probably going to care.  But don't try that in a NCAA D1 or NFL game.  You WILL hear about it again.

Offline prab

  • *
  • Posts: 669
  • FAN REACTION: +37/-47
  • Wherever you go, there you are!
Re: Fumble pileup on 4th down, short of line to gain
« Reply #9 on: February 17, 2015, 02:27:50 PM »
The OP did not have any flags.  The proper signal seems to be #8, "First Down B".  The signal is the same whether the first down was gained by B recovering the fumble or by A not reaching the line to gain on 4th down.  If a coach insists, failing to reach the line to gain on 4th down is a guaranteed correct  call.  Therefore, in the OP, spending a lot of time trying to decide whether a fumble recovery by B is technically correct is a variation on the "picking fly poop out of pepper" theme.  Adding an "unseen flag" to the OP means you are now trying to pick fly poop out of pepper while wearing boxing gloves.

Jim D.

  • Guest
Re: Fumble pileup on 4th down, short of line to gain
« Reply #10 on: February 17, 2015, 02:41:03 PM »
I would recommend:
1) Stop the clock.
2) Loudly tell the players "It's over" repeatedly and unpile the players (no need to dive in to see who has it - just stand back and supervise the process).
3) At the end of the unpiling, either one player has it (he gets the stat if needed) or it's join possession (no turnover).
4) Signal first down for B.

Offline ncwingman

  • *
  • Posts: 1510
  • FAN REACTION: +79/-22
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: Fumble pileup on 4th down, short of line to gain
« Reply #11 on: February 17, 2015, 04:37:41 PM »
In addition, the "stat guys" would probably like to know if it was a recovered fumble or a turnover on downs.
Being one of them, I can guarantee you, if you don't call it one way or the other, I will.  Actually, I have to, it has to be recorded one way or the other.

Now, in HS, no overseeing body is probably going to care.  But don't try that in a NCAA D1 or NFL game.  You WILL hear about it again.
3) At the end of the unpiling, either one player has it (he gets the stat if needed) or it's join possession (no turnover).
4) Signal first down for B.

As a covering official, what's the signal you'd give to the stat guy to say who recovered the fumble? At the end, you signal first down for B either way. Unless you got on a microphone and announced it, who would ever be able to tell the difference?

Offline Rulesman

  • Past Keeper of the Keys
  • Refstripes Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 3839
  • FAN REACTION: +65535/-2
  • Live like tomorrow never comes.
Re: Fumble pileup on 4th down, short of line to gain
« Reply #12 on: February 17, 2015, 09:48:02 PM »
Unless you got on a microphone and announced it, who would ever be able to tell the difference?
Someone with a good pair of binoculars. With the right equipment, and after spending the past 5 years in a press box, I've come to learn you can see a lot more from there than the average person might think.
"Gentlemen, we are going to relentlessly chase perfection, knowing full well we will not catch it, because nothing is perfect. But we are going to relentlessly chase it, because in the process we will catch excellence. I am not remotely interested in just being good."
- Vince Lombardi

Jim D.

  • Guest
Re: Fumble pileup on 4th down, short of line to gain
« Reply #13 on: February 18, 2015, 10:23:38 AM »
As a covering official, what's the signal you'd give to the stat guy to say who recovered the fumble? At the end, you signal first down for B either way. Unless you got on a microphone and announced it, who would ever be able to tell the difference?

Years ago in NCAA, the mechanic was for the covering official to grab the guy who recovered the fumble and tap him on the shoulder to indicate that he recovered the fumble. 

Now they prance off the field holding the ball up so every one can see how awesome they are.

Offline prab

  • *
  • Posts: 669
  • FAN REACTION: +37/-47
  • Wherever you go, there you are!
Re: Fumble pileup on 4th down, short of line to gain
« Reply #14 on: February 18, 2015, 10:31:30 AM »
Years ago in NCAA, the mechanic was for the covering official to grab the guy who recovered the fumble and tap him on the shoulder to indicate that he recovered the fumble. 

Now they prance off the field holding the ball up so every one can see how awesome they are.

+1 for finding a legitimate way to use the word "prance" on a football forum.  Another underutilized word!

Offline Magician

  • *
  • Posts: 1084
  • FAN REACTION: +257/-8
Re: Fumble pileup on 4th down, short of line to gain
« Reply #15 on: February 18, 2015, 11:52:05 PM »
Be careful yelling "turnover" until you see the ball. You would hate to do that and find out the ball has squirted out the other side and is currently free. If the pile has been there for a couple seconds with no sign of the ball it is safer to announce something like "it's over" and blowing a whistle and stopping the clock.

Offline Legacy Zebra

  • *
  • Posts: 1036
  • FAN REACTION: +56/-11
Re: Fumble pileup on 4th down, short of line to gain
« Reply #16 on: February 19, 2015, 04:57:08 PM »
Quote
+1 for finding a legitimate way to use the word "prance" on a football forum.  Another underutilized word!
The NCAA rule book actually uses it in the ARs. 9-2-1-V mentions a ball carrier prancing backward into the end zone.