Author Topic: Catch/No-Catch  (Read 7742 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TXMike

  • *
  • Posts: 8775
  • FAN REACTION: +229/-269
  • When you quit learning you quit living
Catch/No-Catch
« on: May 10, 2015, 10:22:30 AM »
Is this a catch under 2014 NCAA rules?  http://youtu.be/7uvXrd4W6X0 

Offline FLbackjudge

  • *
  • Posts: 130
  • FAN REACTION: +2/-0
Re: Catch/No-Catch
« Reply #1 on: May 10, 2015, 08:48:22 PM »
Not a catch IMHO.  It seems to me the player is going to the ground as he is attempting to secure the ball, so he needs to maintain control of the ball throughout the process.  This receiver loses control of the ball as he hits the ground.  I'd reverse this call in replay.

Offline timhedge

  • *
  • Posts: 15
  • FAN REACTION: +1/-0
  • Without officials... it is only recess.
Re: Catch/No-Catch
« Reply #2 on: May 11, 2015, 02:31:30 PM »
No catch. The onus is on the receiver to show the official the ball after going to the ground like that.

Offline bossman72

  • *
  • Posts: 2388
  • FAN REACTION: +312/-29
Re: Catch/No-Catch
« Reply #3 on: May 11, 2015, 02:56:50 PM »
Video quality is too poor to decide for me.  Sorry :(

Offline dvasques

  • *
  • Posts: 508
  • FAN REACTION: +13/-2
Re: Catch/No-Catch
« Reply #4 on: May 11, 2015, 09:35:17 PM »
I see him down on the ground extending the ball on one hand... I see a catch

but I might not understand the new rules fully

Offline Sumstine

  • *
  • Posts: 387
  • FAN REACTION: +70/-10
Re: Catch/No-Catch
« Reply #5 on: May 12, 2015, 01:36:03 PM »
One shot and not that clear but couple of things come to mind. If he maintained control through the ground and did not lose the ball until after the reach it is a catch. If he bobbled on the ground or roll it is a much harder sell for a catch but still could be if he secured and then reached. The key is control through the ground the reach is a second act.

texref

  • Guest
Re: Catch/No-Catch
« Reply #6 on: May 12, 2015, 03:10:16 PM »
If that's the only shot I've got I would have to let it Stand.

Offline Etref

  • Administrator
  • ***
  • Posts: 2427
  • FAN REACTION: +88/-29
  • " I don't make the rules coach!"
Re: Catch/No-Catch
« Reply #7 on: May 12, 2015, 09:10:41 PM »
I really don't thing the wing official had a look.
" I don't make the rules coach!"

Offline BlindZebra

  • *
  • Posts: 153
  • FAN REACTION: +4/-1
Re: Catch/No-Catch
« Reply #8 on: May 13, 2015, 01:34:40 PM »
One shot and not that clear but couple of things come to mind. If he maintained control through the ground and did not lose the ball until after the reach it is a catch. If he bobbled on the ground or roll it is a much harder sell for a catch but still could be if he secured and then reached. The key is control through the ground the reach is a second act.

Agree.  I think his reach is a second act.  "Double Action"

Offline Joe Stack

  • *
  • Posts: 637
  • FAN REACTION: +33/-46
Re: Catch/No-Catch
« Reply #9 on: May 13, 2015, 05:50:34 PM »
I see the ball coming "loose" only AFTER the receiver is down and the play is dead. If it came out before that, I didn't see it and thus can't comment. Based on that, I have a catch and would confirm (the call) on any replay request.