0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
My question now would be if the illegal kick by B is considered to be a foul by the team with possesion or not
I am in agreement with you now. I had to diagram it out. Your interpretation is correct. In my mind I had B kicking the ball backward which would have been over A's goal line. That really made no sense. It was bad reading on my part and then stubbornness kicked in.
That was the mistake I made until I diagramed it out. B's end zone is 5 yards away. It is the end zone A is kicking toward of course. It is A's end zone that is 95 yards away. I felt foolish when I realized my mistake.
See rule 10-2-3-b. And IT IS NOT AN ILLEGAL KICK, IT IS ILLEGALLY KICKING THE BALL. Sorry, I'll get off the soap box now.
This illustrates one of the differences between the way we treat kicks vs passes. If a pass is tipped in or behind the NZ and subsequently crosses the NZ, the pass has not crossed the NZ by rule. Not so with a kick. If a kick gets past the NZ, it has crossed the NZ. May not have been touched beyond the NZ as yet, but it has crossed it.