Author Topic: Pardon my French...but RUFKM!?!?  (Read 404 times)

Offline TXMike

  • *
  • Posts: 8466
  • FAN REACTION: +223/-240
  • When you quit learning you quit living

Offline NVFOA_Ump

  • *
  • Posts: 2866
  • FAN REACTION: +71/-101
  • High School (MA)
    • Massachusetts Independent Football Officials Association
It's easy to get the players, getting 'em to play together, that's the hard part. - Casey Stengel

Offline centexsports

  • *
  • Posts: 138
  • FAN REACTION: +5/-5
Re: Pardon my French...but RUFKM!?!?
« Reply #2 on: October 11, 2018, 01:45:17 PM »
The uncalled hit looks to me to be the definition of targeting.   The late hit on the downed QB was properly called by the Referee (and did not include targeting).  On a Friday night I would probably call targeting because there is no review.   In slow motion review, it does not look like there was a hard hit to the head.  I can see why they might have passed on targeting.   

I think the biggest question is "Why wasn't the targeting called on the second play."   

Online ElvisLives

  • *
  • Posts: 668
  • FAN REACTION: +53/-44
  • The rules are there if you need them.
Re: Pardon my French...but RUFKM!?!?
« Reply #3 on: October 11, 2018, 03:46:55 PM »
And the UIL in Texas wants to use replay....

Offline Etref

  • Moderator
  • ***
  • Posts: 1738
  • FAN REACTION: +60/-22
  • " I don't make the rules coach!"
Re: Pardon my French...but RUFKM!?!?
« Reply #4 on: October 11, 2018, 04:04:18 PM »
 :!#
" I don't make the rules coach!"

Online bama_stripes

  • *
  • Posts: 2286
  • FAN REACTION: +70/-25
Re: Pardon my French...but RUFKM!?!?
« Reply #5 on: October 12, 2018, 07:15:42 AM »
I think the biggest question is "Why wasn't the targeting called on the second play."

Good question.  Upward thrust + helmet-to-helmet contact.  I would include this hit on a targeting training tape.

Offline TXMike

  • *
  • Posts: 8466
  • FAN REACTION: +223/-240
  • When you quit learning you quit living